Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2021 Sep;135(5):1855-1867.
doi: 10.1007/s00414-021-02581-4. Epub 2021 Apr 30.

A review of visualization techniques of post-mortem computed tomography data for forensic death investigations

Affiliations
Review

A review of visualization techniques of post-mortem computed tomography data for forensic death investigations

Lars Christian Ebert et al. Int J Legal Med. 2021 Sep.

Abstract

Postmortem computed tomography (PMCT) is a standard image modality used in forensic death investigations. Case- and audience-specific visualizations are vital for identifying relevant findings and communicating them appropriately. Different data types and visualization methods exist in 2D and 3D, and all of these types have specific applications. 2D visualizations are more suited for the radiological assessment of PMCT data because they allow the depiction of subtle details. 3D visualizations are better suited for creating visualizations for medical laypersons, such as state attorneys, because they maintain the anatomical context. Visualizations can be refined by using additional techniques, such as annotation or layering. Specialized methods such as 3D printing and virtual and augmented reality often require data conversion. The resulting data can also be used to combine PMCT data with other 3D data such as crime scene laser scans to create crime scene reconstructions. Knowledge of these techniques is essential for the successful handling of PMCT data in a forensic setting. In this review, we present an overview of current visualization techniques for PMCT.

Keywords: 3D printing; Postmortem computed tomography; Reporting; Segmentation; Virtual reality; Visualization.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no competing interests.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Polygon model describing the surface of an anthropologist’s skull, based on data extracted from a CT scan. Polygon meshes consist of points called vertexes that are interconnected by their edges to form polygons or faces
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
PMCT scan of the neck, visualized in different windows. (a) soft tissue window; (b) lung window; (c) bone window; (d) brain window. Note that the material obstructing the airways is only visible in image b, the lung window, and does not appear in any of the other images
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
MPR of a suicidal gunshot injury with the entry wound on the right and the exit wound on the left side. The reconstruction follows the path of the bullet through the brain. (a) coronal view; (b) axial view
Fig. 4
Fig. 4
Different types of complex 2D reconstructions. a Curved MPR of an individual’s dentition, simulating an orthopantomogram that can be compared to antemortem images. b Rib unfolding that can be used in the rapid assessment of multiple rib fractures (c). Skull unfolding showing surgical plates and screws after surgical intervention
Fig. 5
Fig. 5
Different volume visualizations of the same PMCT dataset. a Averaging visually mimics the appearance of a plain radiograph. b MIP highlighting structures with high x-ray density such as bone. The high-density material visible in this image is debris that is located underneath the body. c MinIP visualizing the gas distribution inside the body and excluding the air surrounding the body
Fig. 6
Fig. 6
VRT of a suicidal shotgun injury demonstrating visualization using different transfer functions. (a) Surface visualization. (b) Bone visualization. (c) Visualization of radio dense material in blue
Fig. 7
Fig. 7
Cinematic rendering of a suicidal gunshot injury to the head. The rendering demonstrates increased perceived realism through the physically correct calculation of optical effects such as shadowing. a View from the left showing the exit wound. b Frontal view with skull fracture. c View from the right with entry wound
Fig. 8
Fig. 8
Segmented data. a Sagittal view of a PMCT dataset. b Segmented spine. Each vertebra, disc, and the sacrum has been semiautomatically segmented and color-coded
Fig. 9
Fig. 9
Visualization of drug containers on PMCT in a case of body backing. VRT of soft tissue and bone was mixed with a polygon rendering resulting from segmentation of the drug containers
Fig. 10
Fig. 10
Visualization of a hanging using multiple layered cinematic renderings (bone, muscle body, and surface). Using this method, the bony structures of the neck and the rope can be visualized at the same time despite the fact that the rope has a Hounsfield density similar to that of the soft tissue. Painted transparencies on different layers allow exposure of underlying structures such as the hyoid bone
Fig. 11
Fig. 11
Annotated images. a Visualization of hemothorax and tension pneumothorax by color-coding of different structures. Heart (green), lungs (blue), and blood (red). b Combined VRT and polygon rendering displaying dislodged bone fragments. Additional annotations highlight the bullet path as well as a smaller projectile fragment. c Cinematic rendering of fractures of the ribs and clavicular bone, annotated using different-colored arrows
Fig. 12
Fig. 12
3D-printed skull extracted from a CT scan using FDM printing

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Carew RM, Errickson D. Imaging in forensic science: five years on. J Forensic Radiol Imaging. 2019;16:24–33. doi: 10.1016/j.jofri.2019.01.002. - DOI
    1. Flach PM, Gascho D, Schweitzer W, et al. Imaging in forensic radiology: an illustrated guide for postmortem computed tomography technique and protocols. Forensic Sci Med Pathol. 2014;10:583–606. doi: 10.1007/s12024-014-9555-6. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Grabherr S, Grimm J, Dominguez A, et al. Advances in post-mortem CT-angiography. Br J Radiol. 2014;87:20130488. doi: 10.1259/bjr.20130488. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Jalalzadeh H, Giannakopoulos GF, Berger FH, et al. Post-mortem imaging compared with autopsy in trauma victims – a systematic review. Forensic Sci Int. 2015;257:29–48. doi: 10.1016/j.forsciint.2015.07.026. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Ebert LC, Flach P, Schweitzer W, et al. Forensic 3D surface documentation at the Institute of forensic medicine in Zurich – workflow and communication pipeline. J Forensic Radiol Imaging. 2016;5:1–7. doi: 10.1016/j.jofri.2015.11.007. - DOI