SARS-CoV-2 worldwide replication drives rapid rise and selection of mutations across the viral genome: a time-course study - potential challenge for vaccines and therapies
- PMID: 33931941
- PMCID: PMC8185546
- DOI: 10.15252/emmm.202114062
SARS-CoV-2 worldwide replication drives rapid rise and selection of mutations across the viral genome: a time-course study - potential challenge for vaccines and therapies
Abstract
Scientists and the public were alarmed at the first large viral variant of SARS-CoV-2 reported in December 2020. We have followed the time course of emerging viral mutants and variants during the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic in ten countries on four continents. We examined > 383,500 complete SARS-CoV-2 nucleotide sequences in GISAID (Global Initiative of Sharing All Influenza Data) with sampling dates extending until April 05, 2021. These sequences originated from ten different countries: United Kingdom, South Africa, Brazil, United States, India, Russia, France, Spain, Germany, and China. Among the 77 to 100 novel mutations, some previously reported mutations waned and some of them increased in prevalence over time. VUI2012/01 (B.1.1.7) and 501Y.V2 (B.1.351), the so-called UK and South Africa variants, respectively, and two variants from Brazil, 484K.V2, now called P.1 and P.2, increased in prevalence. Despite lockdowns, worldwide active replication in genetically and socio-economically diverse populations facilitated selection of new mutations. The data on mutant and variant SARS-CoV-2 strains provided here comprise a global resource for easy access to the myriad mutations and variants detected to date globally. Rapidly evolving new variant and mutant strains might give rise to escape variants, capable of limiting the efficacy of vaccines, therapies, and diagnostic tests.
Keywords: South African and Brazil variants; UK variant B.1.1.7; high incidence of C to T transitions; numerous new mutations; time course of SARS-CoV-2 mutant emergence.
© 2021 The Authors. Published under the terms of the CC BY 4.0 license.
Conflict of interest statement
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
Figures
References
-
- Anant S, Davidson NO (2001) Molecular mechanisms of apolipoprotein B mRNA editing. Curr Opin Lipidol 12: 159–165 - PubMed
-
- Annavajhala MK, Mohri H, Zucker JE, Sheng Z, Wang P, Gomez‐Simmonds A, Ho DD, Uhlemann A‐C (2021) A novel SARS‐CoV‐2 variant of concern, B.1.526, identified in New York. medRxiv 10.1101/2021.02.23.21252259 [PREPRINT] - DOI
-
- Burioni R, Topol E (2021) Assessing the human immune response to SARS‐CoV‐2 variants. Nat Med 27: 571–572 - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical
Miscellaneous
