Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2022 Mar;132(3):600-611.
doi: 10.1002/lary.29591. Epub 2021 May 1.

Evidence for Above Cuff Vocalization in Patients With a Tracheostomy: A Systematic Review

Affiliations
Free article

Evidence for Above Cuff Vocalization in Patients With a Tracheostomy: A Systematic Review

Claire S Mills et al. Laryngoscope. 2022 Mar.
Free article

Abstract

Objectives/hypothesis: To determine how above cuff vocalization (ACV) is implemented in clinical practice, to identify what evidence exists on the effectiveness and safety of ACV, and to evaluate the acceptability of ACV.

Study design: Systematic review.

Methods: A literature search was conducted in eight databases (MEDLINE, Embase, AMED, CINAHL, Cochrane Library, PsycINFO, Scopus, and Web of Science) in May 2019 and updated in June 2020. Two reviewers independently screened, selected, and extracted data. Study quality was appraised using the Joanna Briggs Institute Critical Appraisal Tools and a narrative synthesis was conducted. Systematic review registration number: CRD42019133942.

Results: The searches identified 1327 records. The 13 eligible studies included four case studies, three case series, four observational studies without a control group, one quasi-experimental study, and one randomized controlled trial. Study quality was low, with most studies having high risk of bias. There was a high level of heterogeneity in study design and outcome measures used. Detailed information on ACV application and dose-delivered was lacking in 12 studies. Positive effects were reported for communication (n = 7), swallowing (n = 4), cough response (n = 2), and quality-of-life (n = 2), but with inconsistent use of objective outcome measures. There is limited quantitative or qualitative evidence for acceptability. Adverse events and complications were reported in nine studies, and four highlighted the importance of involving an experienced speech and language therapist.

Conclusions: There is limited evidence for the acceptability, effectiveness, safety, or optimal implementation of ACV. The evidence is insufficient to provide recommendations regarding optimal intervention delivery. Future research should ensure detailed recording of ACV delivery and utilize a core outcome set. Laryngoscope, 132:600-611, 2022.

Keywords: Above cuff vocalization; communication; deglutition; talking tracheostomy; tracheostomy.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

BIBLIOGRAPHY

    1. Sasaki CT, Suzuki M, Horiuchi M, Kirchner JA. The effect of tracheostomy on the laryngeal closure reflex. Laryngoscope 1977;87:1428-1433. https://doi.org/10.1288/00005537-197709000-00003.
    1. Siebens AA, Tippett DC, Kirby N, French J. Dysphagia and expiratory air flow. Dysphagia 1993;8:266-269. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01354549.
    1. Grossbach I, Stranberg S, Chlan L. Promoting effective communication for patients receiving mechanical ventilation. Crit Care Nurse 2011;31:46-60. https://doi.org/10.4037/ccn2010728.
    1. Patak L, Gawlinski A, Fung NI, Doering L, Berg J, Henneman EA. Communication boards in critical care: patients' views. Appl Nurs Res 2006;19:182-190. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apnr.2005.09.006.
    1. Kothari M, Bjerrum K, Nielsen LH, Jensen J, Nielsen JF. Influence of external subglottic air flow on dysphagic tracheotomized patients with severe brain injury: preliminary findings. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol 2017;126:199-204. https://doi.org/10.1177/0003489416683192.

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources