Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2021 May 1.
doi: 10.1007/s11356-021-14163-3. Online ahead of print.

Rice straw burning: a review on its global prevalence and the sustainable alternatives for its effective mitigation

Affiliations
Review

Rice straw burning: a review on its global prevalence and the sustainable alternatives for its effective mitigation

Gurraj Singh et al. Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. .

Abstract

Being one of the most important staple crops of the world, rice has played a vital role in slaking the calorie requirements of the masses in all the inhabitable continents of our planet. Regardless of this fact, there are many environmental concerns related to the rice production systems across the globe. One of the major worries is the emission of lethal greenhouse gases as a result of the different steps and procedures concerned with rice production and their contribution towards global warming. This study presents the status quo of the rice straw burning practice across the globe. It focuses on the greenhouse gas emissions as a result of the open field burning of rice residues and its direct effect on the environment, eventually contributing towards climate change. The study evidently shortlists the most profound regions contributing towards the open burning dilemma and the socio-political reasons associated with it. The study additionally discusses the different alternatives to straw burning with a clear-cut motive of throwing light on the opportunities that lie in the efficacious and sustainable utilization of homogeneous agricultural wastes. Different in-field straw management techniques related to the farmers and off-field methods related to the industry have been discussed. Predicated upon a survey of the life cycle assessment (LCA) studies across the globe, it is concluded that soil incorporation and electricity generation are the most environment friendly alternatives with an enormous scope of improvement in the coming future.

Keywords: Climate changes; Environmental aspects; Government policies; Greenhouse gases; Life cycle assessment; Rice straw burning.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Abbas S, Ali Z (2020) Impact of temperature and rainfall on rice production. Environ Dev Sustain 23:1706–1728. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10668-020-00647-8
    1. Abdelhady S, Borello D, Shaban A, Rispoli F (2014) Viability study of biomass power plant fired with rice straw. In. Energy Procedia 61:211–215. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.egypro.2014.11.1072
    1. Ahmed T (2013) Burning crop waste in Punjab, Pakistan – can farmers do better for themselves and the environment? Policy Brief, Sandee
    1. Amarante EB, Romero O, Gil Z (2019) Life cycle assessment of the valorization of rice straw for energy purposes. Rice production in Cuba. Journal of agriculture and environment for international development (JAEID) 112(2):297–320. https://doi.org/10.12895/jaeid.20182.741
    1. Andini A, Bonnet S, Rousset P, Hasanudin U (2018) Impact of open burning of crop residues on air pollution and climate change in Indonesia. Curr Sci 115:2259–2266. https://doi.org/10.18520/cs/v115/i12/2259-2266

LinkOut - more resources