Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2021 Jul;27(7):1058-1062.
doi: 10.1016/j.jiac.2021.04.010. Epub 2021 Apr 17.

Accuracy of rapid antigen detection test for nasopharyngeal swab specimens and saliva samples in comparison with RT-PCR and viral culture for SARS-CoV-2 detection

Affiliations

Accuracy of rapid antigen detection test for nasopharyngeal swab specimens and saliva samples in comparison with RT-PCR and viral culture for SARS-CoV-2 detection

Yoshifumi Uwamino et al. J Infect Chemother. 2021 Jul.

Abstract

Introduction: Rapid antigen detection (RAD) tests are convenient tools for detecting the severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) in clinics, and testing using saliva samples could decrease the risk of infection during sample collection. This study aimed to assess the accuracy of the SARS-CoV-2 RAD for testing of nasopharyngeal swab specimens and saliva samples in comparison with the RT-PCR tests and viral culture for detecting viable virus.

Methods: One hundred seventeen nasopharyngeal swab specimens and 73 saliva samples with positive results on RT-PCR were used. Residual samples were assayed using a commercially available RAD test immediately, and its positivity was determined at various time points during the clinical course. The concordance between 54 nasopharyngeal swab samples and saliva samples that were collected simultaneously was determined. Viral culture was performed on 117 samples and compared with the results of the RAD test.

Results: The positive rate of RAD test using saliva samples was low throughout the clinical course. Poor concordance was observed between nasopharyngeal swab specimens and saliva samples (75.9%, kappa coefficient 0.310). However, a substantially high concordance between the RAD test and viral culture was observed in both nasopharyngeal swab specimens (86.8%, kappa coefficient 0.680) and saliva samples (95.1%, kappa coefficient 0.643).

Conclusions: The sensitivity of the SARS-CoV-2 RAD test was insufficient, particularly for saliva samples. However, a substantially high concordance with viral culture suggests its potential utility as an auxiliary test for estimating SARS-CoV-2 viability.

Keywords: Nasopharyngeal swabs; Rapid antigen detection test; SARS-CoV-2; Saliva; Viral culture.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

None.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Time course from symptom onset and RAD test positivity. The correlation between days from COVID-19 symptom onset and RAD test results of nasopharyngeal swab (NPS) specimens and saliva samples was examined. Black bar shows the number of RAD test-positive samples, and the grey bar shows the negative samples. Except for the NPS specimens that were collected within 4 days from symptom onset that yielded high positivity, the RAD test positivity was generally low.
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Real-time RT-PCR Ct values of the samples and RAD test results. Median Ct values (N1 sets) were lower in RAD test-positive samples than in negative samples among nasopharyngeal swab (NPS) specimens and saliva samples.

References

    1. Iwasaki S., Fujisawa S., Nakakubo S., Kamada K., Yamashita Y., Fukumoto T., et al. Comparison of sars-cov-2 detection in nasopharyngeal swab and saliva. J Infect. 2020 doi: 10.1016/j.jinf.2020.05.071. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Williams E., Bond K., Zhang B., Putland M., Williamson D.A. Saliva as a non-invasive specimen for detection of sars-cov-2. J Clin Microbiol. 2020 doi: 10.1128/jcm.00776-20. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Nagura-Ikeda M., Imai K., Tabata S., Miyoshi K., Murahara N., Mizuno T., et al. Clinical evaluation of self-collected saliva by quantitative reverse transcription-pcr (rt-qpcr), direct rt-qpcr, reverse transcription-loop-mediated isothermal amplification, and a rapid antigen test to diagnose covid-19. J Clin Microbiol. 2020;58 - PMC - PubMed
    1. Mak G.C., Cheng P.K., Lau S.S., Wong K.K., Lau C.S., Lam E.T., et al. Evaluation of rapid antigen test for detection of sars-cov-2 virus. J Clin Virol. 2020;129:104500. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Uwamino Y., Nagata M., Aoki W., Fujimori Y., Nakagawa T., Yokota H., et al. Accuracy and stability of saliva as a sample for reverse transcription pcr detection of sars-cov-2. J Clin Pathol. 2020 doi: 10.1136/jclinpath-2020-206972. - DOI - PubMed