Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2021 Apr 15:12:628809.
doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.628809. eCollection 2021.

School Violence and Teacher Professional Engagement: A Cross-National Study

Youcai Yang  1   2 , Lixia Qin  3 , Ling Ning  4
Affiliations

School Violence and Teacher Professional Engagement: A Cross-National Study

Youcai Yang et al. Front Psychol. .

Abstract

School violence research has mainly focused on the impact on students. Very few studies, even fewer from a cross-cultural perspective, have examined the relationships between school violence and teacher professional engagement, and the role played by teacher self-efficacy and school climate related factors. The present study utilizes a SEM research methodology to analyze the 2013 TALIS data. The purpose is to understand and compare the relationships in four different cultural contexts; the U.S., England, South Korea, and Mexico. Results indicate, on average, that the significant and negative impacts of school violence on teacher professional engagement are partly mediated by teacher self-efficacy. The negativity of school violence is significantly alleviated by enhancing participation among school stakeholders and improving teacher-student relationships. The relationships among the factors apply across all four cultural systems, though, the effects of factors and variables vary to a degree. The paper also discusses other relevant issues and differences as well as their implications.

Keywords: cross-national comparison; school climate; school violence; structural equation modeling (SEM); teacher professional engagement; teacher self-efficacy.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
SEM model on school violence and teacher professional engagement.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Standardized estimates of the SEM model (USA).
Figure 3
Figure 3
Standardized estimates of the SEM model (KOREA).
Figure 4
Figure 4
Standardized estimates of the SEM model (ENGLAND).
Figure 5
Figure 5
Standardized estimates of the SEM model (MEXICO).
See this image and copyright information in PMC

Similar articles

See all similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Akiba M., LeTendre G. K., Baker D. P., Goesling B. (2002). Student victimization: national and school system effects on school violence in 37 nations. Am. Educ. Res. J. 39, 829–853. 10.3102/00028312039004829 - DOI
    1. Alloy L. B., Ahrens A. H. (1987). Depression and pessimism for the future: biased use of statistically relevant information in predictions for self versus others. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 52:366. - PubMed
    1. Anderson J. C., Gerbing D. W. (1988). Structural equation modeling in practice: a review and recommended two-step approach. Psychol. Bull. 103, 411. 10.1037/0033-2909.103.3.411 - DOI
    1. Baker D. P., LeTendre G. K., Akiba M. (2005). “Safe schools, dangerous nations: the paradox of school violence,” in National Difference, Global Similarities: World Culture and the Future of Schooling, eds D. P. Baker and G. K. LeTendre (Palo Alto, CA: Stanford University Press; ).
    1. Bandura A. (1986). The explanatory and predictive scope of self-efficacy theory. J. Soc. Clin. Psychol. 4, 359–373. 10.1521/jscp.1986.4.3.359 - DOI

LinkOut - more resources