Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2021 Jan 25:2020:283-292.
eCollection 2020.

Impact of IMPACT: Longitudinal Analysis of an Integrated Participant Scheduling System in a Clinical Research Setting

Affiliations
Review

Impact of IMPACT: Longitudinal Analysis of an Integrated Participant Scheduling System in a Clinical Research Setting

Alex Butler et al. AMIA Annu Symp Proc. .

Abstract

Rapidly increasing costs have been a major threat to our clinical research enterprise. Improvement in appointment scheduling is a crucial means to boost efficiency and save cost in clinical research and has been well studied in the outpatient setting. This study reviews nearly 5 years of usage data of an integrated scheduling system implemented at Columbia University/New York Presbyterian (CUIMC/NYP) called IMPACT and provides original insights into the challenges faced by a clinical research facility. Briefly, the IMPACT data shows that high rates of room and resource changes correlate with rescheduled appointments and that rescheduled visits are more likely to be attended than non-rescheduled visits. We highlight the differing roles of schedulers, coordinators, and investigators, and propose a highly accurate predictive model of participant no-shows in a research setting. This study sheds light on ways to reduce overall cost and improve the care we offer to clinical research participants.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.. Sample screenshot of the IMPACT scheduling tool for Schedulers (left side) and Coordinators (right side)
Figure 2.
Figure 2.. Visit status flow outlining temporary status (yellow) and final status (green). Visit count in each status also included.
Figure 3.
Figure 3.. Logistic Regression (left). Wide and Deep Model (middle). MLP Classifier (right).
Figure 4.
Figure 4.. Visit count by status each quarter
Figure 5.
Figure 5.. Sunburst plot of visit status (total visit count = 71,788).
Figure 6.
Figure 6.. Flow rate for each clinical research visit room

References

    1. Mate S, Burkle T, Kapsner LA, et al. A method for the graphical modeling of relative temporal constraints. J Biomed Inform. 2019;100(103314) doi: 10.1016/j.jbi.2019.103314. [published Online First: Epub Date]|. - PubMed
    1. National Academies of Sciences E, Medicine Key Operational Characteristics and Functionalities of a State-of- the-Art Patient Scheduling System: Proceedings of a Workshop—in Brief; Washington, DC. The National Academies Press; 2019.
    1. Green LV, Savin S. Reducing Delays for Medical Appointments: A Queueing Approach. Operations Research. 2008;56((6)):1526–38. doi: 10.1287/opre.1080.0575. [published Online First: Epub Date]|.
    1. Idowu P, Adeosun O, Williams K. Dependable Online Appointment Booking System for Nhis Outpatient in Nigerian Teaching Hospitals. International Journal of Computer Science and Information Technology. 2014;6:59–73. doi: 10.5121/ijcsit.2014.6405. [published Online First: Epub Date]|.
    1. Deyo RA, Inui TS. Dropouts and broken appointments. A literature review and agenda for future research. Med Care. 1980;18((11)):1146–57. doi: 10.1097/00005650-198011000-00006. [published Online First: Epub Date]|. - PubMed

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources