Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2021 May 3;23(7):77.
doi: 10.1007/s11912-021-01066-2.

Modeling Precision Cardio-Oncology: Using Human-Induced Pluripotent Stem Cells for Risk Stratification and Prevention

Affiliations
Review

Modeling Precision Cardio-Oncology: Using Human-Induced Pluripotent Stem Cells for Risk Stratification and Prevention

Tatiana R Perry et al. Curr Oncol Rep. .

Abstract

Purpose of review: Cardiovascular toxicity is a leading cause of mortality among cancer survivors and has become increasingly prevalent due to improved cancer survival rates. In this review, we synthesize evidence illustrating how common cancer therapeutic agents, such as anthracyclines, human epidermal growth factors receptors (HER2) monoclonal antibodies, and tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs), have been evaluated in cardiomyocytes (CMs) derived from human-induced pluripotent stem cells (hiPSCs) to understand the underlying mechanisms of cardiovascular toxicity. We place this in the context of precision cardio-oncology, an emerging concept for personalizing the prevention and management of cardiovascular toxicities from cancer therapies, accounting for each individual patient's unique factors. We outline steps that will need to be addressed by multidisciplinary teams of cardiologists and oncologists in partnership with regulators to implement future applications of hiPSCs in precision cardio-oncology.

Recent findings: Current prevention of cardiovascular toxicity involves routine screenings and management of modifiable risk factors for cancer patients, as well as the initiation of cardioprotective medications. Despite recent advancements in precision cardio-oncology, knowledge gaps remain and limit our ability to appropriately predict with precision which patients will develop cardiovascular toxicity. Investigations using patient-specific CMs facilitate pharmacological discovery, mechanistic toxicity studies, and the identification of cardioprotective pathways. Studies with hiPSCs demonstrate that patients with comorbidities have more frequent adverse responses, compared to their counterparts without cardiac disease. Further studies utilizing hiPSC modeling should be considered, to evaluate the impact and mitigation of known cardiovascular risk factors, including blood pressure, body mass index (BMI), smoking status, diabetes, and physical activity in their role in cardiovascular toxicity after cancer therapy. Future real-world applications will depend on understanding the current use of hiPSC modeling in order for oncologists and cardiologists together to inform their potential to improve our clinical collaborative practice in cardio-oncology. When applying such in vitro characterization, it is hypothesized that a safety score can be assigned to each individual to determine who has a greater probability of developing cardiovascular toxicity. Using hiPSCs to create personalized models and ultimately evaluate the cardiovascular toxicity of individuals' treatments may one day lead to more patient-specific treatment plans in precision cardio-oncology while reducing cardiovascular disease (CVD) morbidity and mortality.

Keywords: Cardio-oncology; Cardiovascular toxicity; Precision medicine; Prevention; Risk stratification; hiPSCs.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no competing interests.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Personalized and predictive health assessment using human-induced pluripotent stem cells (hiPSCs). 1, Patient diagnosis of cancer necessitating therapy with substantial potential for cardiovascular toxicity; 2, primary somatic cell types such as peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs) or fibroblasts taken from the patient to form their own cell line; 3, cultivating and differentiating hiPSCs to cardiomyocytes; 4, studying hiPSC-CM cellular response to chemotherapeutic agents; 5, individualized risk predictions based on cardiotoxicity risk profiles developed using patient’s own hiPSCs; 6, personalized therapy recommended for the patient; 7, shared decision-making (SDM) between the patient and clinician regarding cancer therapy considerations and appropriate cardioprotective measures

References

    1. Schwach V, Slaats RH, Passier R. Human pluripotent stem cell-derived cardiomyocytes for assessment of anticancer drug-induced cardiotoxicity. Front Cardiovasc Med. 2020;7(50). - PMC - PubMed
    1. Han X, Zhou Y, Liu W. Precision cardio-oncology: understanding the cardiotoxicity of cancer therapy. NPJ Precis Oncol. 2017;1(1):31. doi: 10.1038/s41698-017-0034-x. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Stack JP, Moslehi J, Sayed N, Wu JC. Cancer therapy-induced cardiomyopathy: can human induced pluripotent stem cell modelling help prevent it? Eur Heart J. 2018;40(22):1764–1770. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehx811. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Brown SA, Sandhu N, Herrmann J. Systems biology approaches to adverse drug effects: the example of cardio-oncology. Nat Rev Clin Oncol. 2015;12(12):718–731. doi: 10.1038/nrclinonc.2015.168. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Brown SA, Nhola L, Herrmann J. Cardiovascular toxicities of small molecule tyrosine kinase inhibitors: an opportunity for systems-based approaches. Clin Pharmacol Ther. 2017;101(1):65–80. doi: 10.1002/cpt.552. - DOI - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms