Chemotherapy for non-Hodgkin lymphoma in the hemodialysis patient: A comprehensive review
- PMID: 33938097
- PMCID: PMC8253291
- DOI: 10.1111/cas.14933
Chemotherapy for non-Hodgkin lymphoma in the hemodialysis patient: A comprehensive review
Abstract
Chemotherapy for non-Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL) in the hemodialysis (HD) patient is a challenging situation. Because many drugs are predominantly eliminated by the kidneys, chemotherapy in the HD patient requires special considerations concerning dose adjustments to avoid overdose and toxicities. Conversely, some drugs are removed by HD and may expose the patient to undertreatment, therefore the timing of drug administration in relation to HD sessions must be carefully planned. Also, the metabolites of some drugs show different toxicities and dialysability as compared with the parent drug, therefore this must also be catered for. However, the pharmacokinetics of many chemotherapeutics and their metabolites in HD patients are unknown, and the fact that NHL patients are often treated with distinct multiagent chemotherapy regimens makes the situation more complicated. In a realm where uncertainty prevails, case reports and case series reporting on actual treatment and outcomes are extremely valuable and can aid physicians in decision making from drug selection to dosing. We carried out an exhaustive review of the literature and adopted 48 manuscripts consisting of 66 HD patients undergoing 71 chemotherapy regimens for NHL, summarized the data, and provide recommendations concerning dose adjustments and timing of administration for individual chemotherapeutics where possible. The chemotherapy regimens studied in this review include, but are not limited to, rituximab, cyclophosphamide + vincristine + prednisolone (CVP) and cyclophosphamide + doxorubicin + vincristine + prednisolone (CHOP)-like regimens, chlorambucil, ibrutinib, bendamustine, methotrexate, platinum compounds, cytarabine, gemcitabine, etoposide, ifosfamide, melphalan, busulfan, fludarabine, mogamulizumab, brentuximab vedotin, and 90 Y-ibritumomab tiuxetan.
Keywords: DLBCL; ESRD; R-CHOP; end-stage renal disease; renal replacement therapy.
© 2021 The Authors. Cancer Science published by John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd on behalf of Japanese Cancer Association.
Conflict of interest statement
NK received grants from Meiji Seika Pharma, Shire/Takeda, Chugai Pharmaceutical, Kyowa Kirin, and Bristol‐Meyer Squibb. NK received personal fees from Shire/Takeda. All other authors declare no conflict of interest.
References
-
- Hortlund M, Arroyo Muhr LS, Storm H, Engholm G, Dillner J, Bzhalava D. Cancer risks after solid organ transplantation and after long‐term dialysis. Int J Cancer. 2017;140(5):1091‐1101. - PubMed
-
- Alkhunaizi AM, Daabil RA, Dawamneh MF. Acute kidney injury secondary to lymphomatous infiltration and the role of kidney biopsy. Saudi Med J. 2008;29(12):1808‐1810. - PubMed
-
- Ochi Y, Hiramoto N, Ono Y, et al. Tolerability and efficacy of rituximab‐containing immunochemotherapy in patients with B‐cell non‐Hodgkin lymphoma receiving hemodialysis. Leuk Lymphoma. 2016;57(8):1945‐1948. - PubMed
-
- Janus N, Thariat J, Boulanger H, Deray G, Launay‐Vacher V. Proposal for dosage adjustment and timing of chemotherapy in hemodialyzed patients. Ann Oncol. 2010;21(7):1395‐1403. - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
Supplementary concepts
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical
Research Materials
