Association Between Premorbid Beta-Blocker Exposure and Sepsis Outcomes-The Beta-Blockers in European and Australian/American Septic Patients (BEAST) Study
- PMID: 33938711
- DOI: 10.1097/CCM.0000000000005034
Association Between Premorbid Beta-Blocker Exposure and Sepsis Outcomes-The Beta-Blockers in European and Australian/American Septic Patients (BEAST) Study
Abstract
Objectives: To examine the effect of premorbid β-blocker exposure on mortality and organ dysfunction in sepsis.
Design: Retrospective observational study.
Setting: ICUs in Australia, the Czech Republic, and the United States.
Patients: Total of 4,086 critical care patients above 18 years old with sepsis between January 2014 and December 2018.
Intervention: Premorbid beta-blocker exposure.
Measurements and main results: One thousand five hundred fifty-six patients (38%) with premorbid β-blocker exposure were identified. Overall ICU mortality rate was 15.1%. In adjusted models, premorbid β-blocker exposure was associated with decreased ICU (adjusted odds ratio, 0.80; 95% CI, 0.66-0.97; p = 0.025) and hospital (adjusted odds ratio, 0.83; 95% CI, 0.71-0.99; p = 0.033) mortality. The risk reduction in ICU mortality of 16% was significant (hazard ratio, 0.84, 95% CI, 0.71-0.99; p = 0.037). In particular, exposure to noncardioselective β-blocker before septic episode was associated with decreased mortality. Sequential Organ Failure Assessment score analysis showed that premorbid β-blocker exposure had potential benefits in reducing respiratory and neurologic dysfunction.
Conclusions: This study suggests that β-blocker exposure prior to sepsis, especially to noncardioselective β blockers, may be associated with better outcome. The findings suggest prospective evaluation of β-blocker use in the management of sepsis.
Copyright © 2021 by the Society of Critical Care Medicine and Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
Conflict of interest statement
Drs. K. Tan’s, Y. Tan’s, and Nalos’ institutions received funding from the Nepean Institute of Critical Care Education and Research. Dr. Nalos also received funding from the Charles University Research Fund and the Ministry of Youth and Education Services of the Czech Republic. Dr. Nalos is supported by the Charles University Research Fund (project number Q39) and by project number CZ.02.1.01/0.0/.0/16_019/0000787 “Fighting Infectious Diseases,” awarded by the Ministry of Youth and Education Services of the Czech Republic. The remaining authors have disclosed that there are no potential conflicts of interest.
References
-
- Singer M, Deutschman CS, Seymour CW, et al.: The third international consensus definitions for sepsis and septic shock (Sepsis-3). JAMA 2016; 315:801–810
-
- Kaukonen KM, Bailey M, Suzuki S, et al.: Mortality related to severe sepsis and septic shock among critically ill patients in Australia and New Zealand, 2000-2012. JAMA 2014; 311:1308–1316
-
- Levy MM, Evans LE, Rhodes A: The surviving sepsis campaign bundle: 2018 update. Intensive Care Med 2018; 44:925–928
-
- Annane D, Renault A, Brun-Buisson C, et al.; CRICS-TRIGGERSEP Network: Hydrocortisone plus fludrocortisone for adults with septic shock. N Engl J Med 2018; 378:809–818
-
- Hartmann C, Radermacher P, Wepler M, et al.: Non-hemodynamic effects of catecholamines. Shock 2017; 48:390–400
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical
