Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2021 Dec;25(12):6707-6715.
doi: 10.1007/s00784-021-03957-x. Epub 2021 May 3.

One-year performance of posterior narrow diameter implants in hyperglycemic and normo-glycemic patients-a pilot study

Affiliations

One-year performance of posterior narrow diameter implants in hyperglycemic and normo-glycemic patients-a pilot study

Anton Friedmann et al. Clin Oral Investig. 2021 Dec.

Abstract

Objectives: The aim of the study was to compare the performance of narrow diameter implants in patients with uncontrolled diabetes mellitus type 2 (T2DM) and normo-glycemic individuals during the first 12 months after implant loading.

Material and methods: In 16 T2DM patients with HbA1C > 6.5% (test group) and 16 normo-glycemic patients (HbA1C < 6.0%; control group), one to two narrow diameter tissue level implants were placed in the posterior maxilla or mandible. After 3-month lasting integration period, implants were loaded by fixed dentures. The clinical parameters probing depth (PD), bleeding on probing (BOP), attachment loss (CAL), recession and papilla bleeding index (PBI) were assessed manually at loading and after 12 months of function. The paired digital periapical radiographs were analyzed with regard to the change in marginal bone level (MBL) from baseline to 12 months' control. The mean values calculated for both patient groups were statistically analyzed. The technical complications were recorded.

Results: The T2DM group accounted 13 patients due to 3 dropouts. The overall implant survival rate after 12 months was 100%. The differences in means for the clinical parameters and the MBL were statistically non-significant between the T2DM and normo-glycemic patients for the short period of loaded function reported here. No technical complications were recorded.

Conclusions: The study demonstrated an encouraging clinical outcome with narrow diameter implants in patients with uncontrolled T2DM compared to non-diabetics after 12 months post loading. For the short observation period, no biological and technical complications were reported regardless the glycemic status.

Clinical relevance: Patients with HbA1C > 6.5% may benefit from the treatment with narrow diameter implants by avoiding complex surgical interventions with augmentation procedures.

Trial registration: Clinicaltrials.gov : NCT04630691.

Keywords: Marginal bone loss; Narrow diameter implants; SLActive surface; TiZr implants; Type 2 diabetes mellitus.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no competing interests.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Flowchart of study protocol. Visit 3 = 3 days, visit 4 = 10 days, visit 5 = 1 month, visit 6 = 3 months, visit 7 = 12 months. PPD probing pocket depth, cAL clinical attachment loss, BOP bleeding on probing, PBI papilla bleeding index
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Radiographic images disclosing the principle for MBL assessment at visit 7. a Adjustment of distortion coefficient. b Distal aspect of the implant. c Mesial aspect of the implant. For further measurements, the mean values from distal and mesial aspects were calculated
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
Results for statistical evaluation of clinical measurements. a Clinical attachment loss. b Recession. c Probing pocket depth
Fig. 4
Fig. 4
Descriptive statistics for a BOP and b papilla bleeding index (PBI)
Fig. 5
Fig. 5
Results from radiographic evaluation of marginal bone loss (MBL). a Comparison of mean ΔMBL (MBL12months − MBL3months). b Descriptive statistics of mean MBL measurements at visits 6 and 7
Fig. 6
Fig. 6
Plots for necessary sample size in a PD measurements and b MBL measurements

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Zimmet P, Alberti KG, Magliano DJ, Bennett PH. Diabetes mellitus statistics on prevalence and mortality: facts and fallacies. Nat Rev Endocrinol. 2016;12:616–622. - PubMed
    1. Lamster IB, Cheng B, Burkett S, Lalla E. Periodontal findings in individuals with newly identified pre-diabetes or diabetes mellitus. J Clin Periodontol. 2014;41:1055–1060. doi: 10.1111/jcpe.12307. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Alasqah MN, Alrabiah M, Al-Aali KA, Mokeem SA, Binmahfooz AM, ArRejaie AS, Abduljabbar T. Peri-implant soft tissue status and crestal bone levels around adjacent implants placed in patients with and without type-2 diabetes mellitus: 6 years follow-up results. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2018;20:562–568. doi: 10.1111/cid.12617. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Al-Sowygh ZH, Ghani SMA, Sergis K, Vohra F, Akram Z. Peri-implant conditions and levels of advanced glycation end products among patients with different glycemic control. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2018;00:1–7. - PubMed
    1. Lagunov VL, Sun J, George R. Evaluation of biologic implant success parameters in type 2 diabetic glycemic control patients versus health patients: a meta-analysis. J Investig Clin Dent. 2019;10:e12478. doi: 10.1111/jicd.12478. - DOI - PubMed

Associated data

LinkOut - more resources