Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2021 Apr;16(2):218-233.
doi: 10.1007/s11899-021-00628-2. Epub 2021 Apr 30.

Chimeric Antigen Receptor-Modified T Cells and T Cell-Engaging Bispecific Antibodies: Different Tools for the Same Job

Affiliations
Review

Chimeric Antigen Receptor-Modified T Cells and T Cell-Engaging Bispecific Antibodies: Different Tools for the Same Job

Melanie Schwerdtfeger et al. Curr Hematol Malig Rep. 2021 Apr.

Abstract

Purpose of review: Both chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T cells and T cell-engaging antibodies (BiAb) have been approved for the treatment of hematological malignancies. However, despite targeting the same antigen, they represent very different classes of therapeutics, each with its distinct advantages and drawbacks. In this review, we compare BiAb and CAR T cells with regard to their mechanism of action, manufacturing, and clinical application. In addition, we present novel strategies to overcome limitations of either approach and to combine the best of both worlds.

Recent findings: By now there are multiple approaches combining the advantages of BiAb and CAR T cells. A major area of research is the application of both formats for solid tumor entities. This includes improving the infiltration of T cells into the tumor, counteracting immunosuppression in the tumor microenvironment, targeting antigen heterogeneity, and limiting off-tumor on-target effects. BiAb come with the major advantage of being an off-the-shelf product and are more controllable because of their half-life. They have also been reported to induce less frequent and less severe adverse events. CAR T cells in turn demonstrate superior response rates, have the potential for long-term persistence, and can be additionally genetically modified to overcome some of their limitations, e.g., to make them more controllable.

Keywords: Adoptive T cell therapy; Bispecific antibody; Cancer; Chimeric antigen receptor; Immunotherapy; T cell redirection.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Melanie Schwerdtfeger, Mohamed-Reda Benmebarek, and Vincenzo Desiderio declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Sebastian Kobold has received TCR2 for consultancy honoraria for education and consultancy from Novartis and GSK. SK has received research support from TCR2 Inc., Boston, and Arcus Biosciences, USA. S K and SE have licensed IP to TCR2 Inc. MaS has served as a consultant/advisor to Amgen, BMS, Celgene, Gilead, Pfizer, Novartis, and Roche. She sits on the advisory boards of Amgen, Celgene, Gilead, Janssen, Novartis, Pfizer, and Seattle Genetics and serves on the speakers’ bureau at Amgen, Celgene, Gilead, Janssen, and Pfizer.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Schematic presentation of the interaction between T cells and tumor cells via a TCR, a BiAb, a CAR, and a SAR in combination with a BiAb. a A CD8+ T cell recognizes a tumor cell presenting a peptide from a tumor antigen on MHC class I via its TCR. b A BiAb mediates T cell recognition of a tumor cell by binding to both an antigen on the T cell surface, most commonly CD3, and a tumor cell surface antigen. c A T cell genetically modified to express a CAR binds a surface antigen expressed on the tumor cell via the scFv domain of the CAR in an MHC-independent manner. d A SAR-transduced T cell interacts with a tumor cell via a BiAb binding the SAR extracellular domain and a tumor cell surface antigen. BiAb, T cell redirecting bispecific antibody; CAR, chimeric antigen receptor; SAR, synthetic agonistic receptor; TCR, T cell receptor

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Lesch S, Benmebarek M-R, Cadilha BL, Stoiber S, Subklewe M, Endres S, Kobold S. Determinants of response and resistance to CAR T cell therapy. Semin Cancer Biol. 2020;65:80–90. doi: 10.1016/j.semcancer.2019.11.004. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Goebeler M-E, Bargou RC. T cell-engaging therapies - BiTEs and beyond. Nat Rev Clin Oncol. 2020;17:418–434. doi: 10.1038/s41571-020-0347-5. - DOI - PubMed
    1. •• Strohl WR, Naso M. Bispecific T-cell redirection versus chimeric antigen receptor (CAR)-T cells as approaches to kill cancer cells. Antibodies (Basel, Switzerland). 2019. 10.3390/antib8030041 Detailed review comparing CAR T and BiAb. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Ellerman D. Bispecific T-cell engagers: towards understanding variables influencing the in vitro potency and tumor selectivity and their modulation to enhance their efficacy and safety. Methods (San Diego Calif) 2019;154:102–117. doi: 10.1016/j.ymeth.2018.10.026. - DOI - PubMed
    1. • Benmebarek M-R, Karches CH, Cadilha BL, Lesch S, Endres S, Kobold S. Killing mechanisms of chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T cells. Int J Mol Sci. 2019. 10.3390/ijms20061283Review on the mechanisms of CAR T cell killing. - PMC - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms

LinkOut - more resources