Correlation of Probe-Based Confocal Laser Endomicroscopy (pCLE) and Mucosal Integrity Testing (MIT) with Epithelial Barrier Function and Presence of Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease (GERD)
- PMID: 33939145
- DOI: 10.1007/s10620-021-06980-w
Correlation of Probe-Based Confocal Laser Endomicroscopy (pCLE) and Mucosal Integrity Testing (MIT) with Epithelial Barrier Function and Presence of Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease (GERD)
Abstract
Introduction: Epithelial barrier function (EBF) disruption is a key mechanism underlying gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD). Our aim was to assess whether two novel technologies, probe-based confocal laser endomicroscopy (pCLE) and mucosal integrity testing (MIT), could assess EBF.
Methods: We prospectively enrolled patients undergoing upper endoscopy for refractory GERD or non-GERD conditions. Patients underwent esophagogastroduodenoscopy, pCLE, MIT, esophageal biopsy at 2 cm and 6 cm above the esophagogastric junction, and wireless pH testing. To assess EBF in vitro, biopsies were mounted in a mini-Ussing chamber, 1 ml of fluorescein was instilled on the mucosal side, and concentration of fluorescein on the serosal side was measured at 3 h.
Results: We enrolled 54 subjects (28 GERD, 26 non-GERD based on Lyon consensus criteria). In vivo permeability assessed by pCLE did not differ significantly between GERD vs. non-GERD patients and did not correlate with in vitro permeability. Mean MIT at 2 cm was lower in GERD compared to non-GERD (1914 vs. 3727 ohms). MIT correlated inversely with in vitro permeability at 2 cm and at 6 cm. Using a predictive model that used slope and intercept of MIT at 2 cm and 6 cm, sensitivity and specificity of MIT at identifying GERD was 76% and 72%, respectively.
Conclusion: pCLE did not differentiate GERD vs non-GERD and did not correlate with EBF measured in vitro. MIT, on the other hand, may be more promising as it differentiated GERD vs non-GERD and correlated with EBF measured in vitro.
Keywords: Barrett esophagus; Diagnostic technique, Digestive system; Electric impedance; Gastroesophageal reflux; Microscopy, Confocal.
© 2021. This is a U.S. government work and not under copyright protection in the U.S.; foreign copyright protection may apply.
Similar articles
-
Mucosal integrity and sensitivity to acid in the proximal esophagus in patients with gastroesophageal reflux disease.Am J Physiol Gastrointest Liver Physiol. 2016 Jul 1;311(1):G117-22. doi: 10.1152/ajpgi.00134.2016. Epub 2016 May 19. Am J Physiol Gastrointest Liver Physiol. 2016. PMID: 27198192
-
Esophageal sensitivity to acid in patients with Barrett's esophagus is not related to preserved esophageal mucosal integrity.Neurogastroenterol Motil. 2017 Jul;29(7). doi: 10.1111/nmo.13066. Epub 2017 Mar 30. Neurogastroenterol Motil. 2017. PMID: 28370911 Clinical Trial.
-
Evaluation of Esophageal Mucosal Integrity in Patients with Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease.Digestion. 2018;97(1):31-37. doi: 10.1159/000484106. Epub 2018 Feb 1. Digestion. 2018. PMID: 29393167 Review.
-
Mucosal impedance testing: A new diagnostic testing in gastroesophageal reflux disease.J Formos Med Assoc. 2020 Nov;119(11):1575-1580. doi: 10.1016/j.jfma.2019.08.007. Epub 2019 Sep 18. J Formos Med Assoc. 2020. PMID: 31542333 Review.
-
Development and Validation of a Mucosal Impedance Contour Analysis System to Distinguish Esophageal Disorders.Gastroenterology. 2019 May;156(6):1617-1626.e1. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2019.01.253. Epub 2019 Jan 31. Gastroenterology. 2019. PMID: 30711626 Free PMC article.
Cited by
-
The role of endoscopy in the management of gastroesophageal reflux disease.DEN Open. 2021 Dec 30;2(1):e86. doi: 10.1002/deo2.86. eCollection 2022 Apr. DEN Open. 2021. PMID: 35310713 Free PMC article. Review.
-
The Role of Intestinal Permeability in Gastrointestinal Disorders and Current Methods of Evaluation.Front Nutr. 2021 Aug 26;8:717925. doi: 10.3389/fnut.2021.717925. eCollection 2021. Front Nutr. 2021. PMID: 34513903 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Esophageal Mucosal Impedance Assessment for the Diagnosis of Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease.J Neurogastroenterol Motil. 2024 Jul 30;30(3):352-360. doi: 10.5056/jnm23063. J Neurogastroenterol Motil. 2024. PMID: 38972870 Free PMC article.
-
Molecular and Functional Recovery of Esophageal Barrier Integrity After Laparoscopic Anti-reflux Surgery.Dig Dis Sci. 2025 Aug;70(8):2665-2673. doi: 10.1007/s10620-025-08951-x. Epub 2025 Apr 16. Dig Dis Sci. 2025. PMID: 40237901
References
-
- Tobey NA, Carson JL, Alkiek RA, Orlando RC. Dilated intercellular spaces: a morphological feature of acid reflux–damaged human esophageal epithelium. Gastroenterology 1996;111:1200–1205. - DOI
-
- Cui R, Zhou L, Lin S et al. The feasibility of light microscopic measurements of intercellular spaces in squamous epithelium in the lower-esophagus of GERD patients. Dis Esophagus 2011;24:1–5. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1442-2050.2010.01083.x . - DOI - PubMed
-
- Ismail-Beigi F, Horton PF, Pope CE 2nd. Histological consequences of gastroesophageal reflux in man. Gastroenterology 1970;58:163–174. - DOI
-
- Tobey NA, Hosseini SS, Argote CM, Dobrucali AM, Awayda MS, Orlando RC. Dilated intercellular spaces and shunt permeability in nonerosive acid-damaged esophageal epithelium. Am J Gastroenterol. 2004;99:13–22. - DOI
-
- Dusenkova S et al. The expression profile of acid-sensing ion channel (ASIC) subunits ASIC1a, ASIC1b, ASIC2a, ASIC2b, and ASIC3 in the esophageal vagal afferent nerve subtypes. Am J Physiol Gastrointest Liver Physiol 2014;307:G922–G930. - DOI
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical