Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2021 Aug;42(4):431-439.
doi: 10.1080/13816810.2021.1913610. Epub 2021 May 3.

Inherited retinal diseases are the most common cause of blindness in the working-age population in Australia

Affiliations

Inherited retinal diseases are the most common cause of blindness in the working-age population in Australia

Rachael C Heath Jeffery et al. Ophthalmic Genet. 2021 Aug.

Erratum in

  • Correction.
    [No authors listed] [No authors listed] Ophthalmic Genet. 2021 Dec;42(6):790. doi: 10.1080/13816810.2021.1976939. Epub 2021 Sep 7. Ophthalmic Genet. 2021. PMID: 34493158 Free PMC article. No abstract available.

Abstract

Background: This study examined the frequency of inherited retinal diseases (IRDs) as the reason for blindness registrations over the last two decades and the demographic and clinical phenotypes of inherited retinal disease (IRD)-related registrations.Materials and methods: Retrospective, observational study of individuals registered with a state-wide blind and vision-impaired registry. Low-vision or blindness-only (≤20/200 or ≤20°) certificates issued to children (0-15 years), working-age (16-64 years) and older-age (65 and older) adults were assessed. Sex and age distributions were examined for the top 20 reasons for certification. Demographic and clinical features of specific phenotypes of IRDs listed in the registry were examined.Results: Amongst 11824 low-vision certificates issued between July 1995 and January 2017, 679 (5.7%) listed an IRD as the reason for registration. In individuals with blindness-only certification (N=4919), IRDs was the second most common diagnosis (8.3%), overtaking glaucoma (8.1%) and diabetic retinopathy (5.4%). IRD was the second most common reason for low-vision certification amongst children (11.6%) and the most common reason amongst working-age population (23.3%). The mean±SD age for IRD-related blindness-only certification was 46±20 years. The top three phenotypes of IRD-related low-vision certification were non-syndromic retinitis pigmentosa (54%), Stargardt disease (12%) and macular dystrophy (8%).Conclusion: Our findings of IRDs as a common cause of blindness in all ages justify continued funding for providing low-vision services and developing treatments for these conditions.

Keywords: Epidemiology; blind Registry; retinal Dystrophy; retinitis Pigmentosa; stargardt Disease.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.
Graphs showing the proportion of all low-vision (first column) or blindness-only (second column) certificates issued for cerebral vision impairment (CVI), inherited retinal disease (IRD), albinism (Alb), optic atrophy (OA), age–related macular degeneration (AMD), optic hypoplasia (OH), diabetic retinopathy (DR), retinal vascular disease (RVD), glaucomatous optic neuropathy (GON), central nervous system diseases (CNS) over the four time frames 1995–2000 (blue), 2001–2005 (red), 2006–2010 (green) and 2011-2016 (purple) for those with childhood (A, B), working-age adult (C, D) or older-age adult (E, F) age of registration
Figure 2.
Figure 2.
Ranking for the mean age at registration for all low-vision certificates (A) and blindness-only certificates (B) for the top 20 ophthalmic diagnoses. AMD; age-related macular degeneration
Figure 3.
Figure 3.
Pie charts showing the proportion of all low-vision certificates (A), legal (<20/200, ≤20°) or borderline (at 20/200, >20°) blindness-only certificates (B) and vision-impaired or unknown certificates (C) attributed to different types of inherited retinal diseases. CDS; cone dysfunction syndrome, COD; cone dystrophy, CORD; cone rod dystrophy

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Crewe JM, Morlet N, Morgan WH, Spilsbury K, Mukhtar AS, Clark A, Semmens JB.. Mortality and hospital morbidity of working-age blind. Br J Ophthalmol. 2013;97(12):1579–85. doi:10.1136/bjophthalmol-2013-303993. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Liew G, Michaelides M, Bunce C. A comparison of the causes of blindness certifications in England and Wales in working age adults (16–64 years), 1999–2000 with 2009–2010. BMJ Open. 2014;4:e004015. doi:10.1136/bmjopen-2013-004015. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Maguire AM, Bennett J, Aleman EM, Leroy BP, Aleman TS. Clinical perspective: treating RPE65-associated retinal dystrophy. Mol Ther. 2020. [online ahead of print]. doi:10.1016/j.ymthe.2020.11.029. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Bertelsen M, Jensen H, Larsen M, Lorenz B, Preising MN, Rosenberg T. Prevalence and diagnostic spectrum of generalized retinal dystrophy in danish children. Ophthalmic Epi. 2013;20:164–69. - PubMed
    1. Bertelsen M, Jensen H, Bregbhoj JF, Rosenberg T. Prevalence of generalized retinal dystrophy in Denmark. Ophthalmic Epidemiol. 2014;21:217–23. - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms