Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2021 Jul;6(7):e522-e527.
doi: 10.1016/S2468-2667(21)00078-5. Epub 2021 Apr 30.

Cervical screening during the COVID-19 pandemic: optimising recovery strategies

Affiliations
Review

Cervical screening during the COVID-19 pandemic: optimising recovery strategies

Alejandra Castanon et al. Lancet Public Health. 2021 Jul.

Abstract

Disruptions to cancer screening services have been experienced in most settings as a consequence of the COVID-19 pandemic. Ideally, programmes would resolve backlogs by temporarily expanding capacity; however, in practice, this is often not possible. We aim to inform the deliberations of decision makers in high-income settings regarding their cervical cancer screening policy response. We caution against performance measures that rely solely on restoring testing volumes to pre-pandemic levels because they will be less effective at mitigating excess cancer diagnoses than will targeted measures. These measures might exacerbate pre-existing inequalities in accessing cervical screening by disregarding the risk profile of the individuals attending. Modelling of cervical screening outcomes before and during the pandemic supports risk-based strategies as the most effective way for screening services to recover. The degree to which screening is organised will determine the feasibility of deploying some risk-based strategies, but implementation of age-based risk stratification should be universally feasible.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Declaration of interests MR reports funding from Hologic and grants from Public Health England, outside of the submitted work. MAS reports grants from the National Health and Medical Research Council and the Cancer Institute New South Wales. SJBH reports grants from National Cancer Centre Japan. SP reports being a member of the Board of Directors for the Canadian Agency for Drugs and Technologies in Health. All other authors declare no competing interests.

References

    1. Vose JM. Delay in cancer screening and diagnosis during the COVID-19 pandemic: what is the cost? Oncology (Williston Park) 2020;34:343. - PubMed
    1. Yong JH, Mainprize JG, Yaffe MJ, et al. The impact of episodic screening interruption: COVID-19 and population-based cancer screening in Canada. J Med Screen. 2020 doi: 10.1177/0969141320974711. published online Nov 26. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Dinmohamed AG, Cellamare M, Visser O, et al. The impact of the temporary suspension of national cancer screening programmes due to the COVID-19 epidemic on the diagnosis of breast and colorectal cancer in the Netherlands. J Hematol Oncol. 2020;13:147. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Maringe C, Spicer J, Morris M, et al. The impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on cancer deaths due to delays in diagnosis in England, UK: a national, population-based, modelling study. Lancet Oncol. 2020;21:1023–1034. - PMC - PubMed
    1. de Jonge L, Worthington J, van Wifferen F, et al. Impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on faecal immunochemical test-based colorectal cancer screening programmes in Australia, Canada, and the Netherlands: a comparative modelling study. Lancet Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2021;6:304–314. - PMC - PubMed

Uncited References

    1. Public Health England. Department of Health & Social Care Guidance on shielding and protecting people who are clinically extremely vulnerable from COVID-19. 2021. https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/guidance-on-shielding-and-pro...

Publication types