The Role of Alcohol Biomarkers in Detecting a Physician's COVID-19-Related Acute Stress Response: A Case Report
- PMID: 33941756
- PMCID: PMC8815638
- DOI: 10.1097/ADM.0000000000000865
The Role of Alcohol Biomarkers in Detecting a Physician's COVID-19-Related Acute Stress Response: A Case Report
Abstract
Objectives: Alcohol biomarkers are used to detect alcohol exposure in clinical and forensic settings. This includes professional health program (PHP) monitoring of healthcare workers in recovery from substance use disorders. Here we present the case of a physician whose positive alcohol biomarker test result was complicated by a traumatic stress response to frontline work during COVID-19.
Methods: An anesthesiologist under PHP monitoring for substance use disorder and depression was interviewed extensively, urine and blood biomarkers were obtained, and longitudinal structured and semi-structured interviews related to anxiety, depression, posttraumatic stress, and cravings were used to monitor responses to the unanticipated death of a patient who succumbed to COVID-19.
Results: After an initial positive ethylglucuronide (EtG) and ethylsulfate (EtS) toxicology test result, all subsequent testing was negative. The physician described compulsive sanitizing hands/arms and mask with highly concentrated ethanol-based products. Standardized assessments and clinical interviews provided documentation of a COVID-19-related post-traumatic stress response. He was connected to additional therapeutic support services and monitoring continued.
Conclusions: Inhalation of ethanol vapors was initially accepted as a possible explanation for the positive EtG/EtS results, though the physician later acknowledged that limited alcohol beverage consumption occurred 6 days prior to the positive test, further complicating its interpretation. Detection of aberrant behavior through ongoing monitoring helps to protect both healthcare workers and the patients they serve.
Copyright © 2021 American Society of Addiction Medicine.
Conflict of interest statement
The authors report no conflicts of interest.
Comment in
-
Letter to the Editor (RE: Polles et al).J Addict Med. 2022 Jan-Feb 01;16(1):e66. doi: 10.1097/ADM.0000000000000908. J Addict Med. 2022. PMID: 35120070 No abstract available.
-
Letter in Reply.J Addict Med. 2022 Jan-Feb 01;16(1):e67. doi: 10.1097/ADM.0000000000000907. J Addict Med. 2022. PMID: 35120071 No abstract available.
References
-
- Kintz P, Villain M, Dumestre V, Cirimele V. Evidence of addiction by anesthesiologists as documented by hair analysis. Forensic Sci Int 2005; 153 (1):81–84. - PubMed
-
- McAuliffe PF, Gold MS, Bajpai L, et al. . Second-hand exposure to aerosolized intravenous anesthetics propofol and fentanyl may cause sensitization and subsequent opiate addiction among anesthesiologists and surgeons. Med Hypotheses 2006; 66 (5):874–882. - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources