Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2022 Apr;18(2):e111-e118.
doi: 10.1111/ajco.13565. Epub 2021 May 4.

Docetaxel and cisplatin induction chemotherapy with or without fluorouracil in locoregionally advanced nasopharyngeal carcinoma: A retrospective propensity score matching analysis

Affiliations

Docetaxel and cisplatin induction chemotherapy with or without fluorouracil in locoregionally advanced nasopharyngeal carcinoma: A retrospective propensity score matching analysis

Hao-Yun Tao et al. Asia Pac J Clin Oncol. 2022 Apr.

Abstract

Purpose: To investigate whether the addition of fluorouracil to docetaxel and cisplatin induction chemotherapy (IC) can truly improve the prognosis of patients with locoregionally advanced nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC).

Methods: A total of 801 patients newly diagnosed with non-metastatic locoregionally advanced NPC were included as the subjects. In this study, propensity score matching (PSM) was used for analysis of overall survival (OS), distant metastasis-free survival (DMFS), progression-free survival (PFS) and locoregional relapse-free survival (LRRFS), and the chi-squared test or Fisher's exact test was used to investigate toxic reactions.

Results: Patients received treatment with docetaxel and cisplatin (TP) or docetaxel, cisplatin and fluorouracil (TPF). With a median follow-up time of 60 months (range: 5-124 months), the TPF group had better 5-year OS (84.7% vs 79.0%; P = 0.037), PFS (84.6% vs 76.8%; P = 0.008) and DMFS (89.5% vs 82.3%; P = 0.004) than the TP group. After PSM, 258 patients were matched in each cohort. The Kaplan-Meier analysis showed that the 5-year OS, PFS and DMFS were 85.5%, 84.2% and 89.2%, respectively, in the TPF group, higher than the 80.8%, 75.0% and 81.4%, respectively, in the TP group (P = 0.048, 0.009 and 0.006, respectively). Moreover, the multivariate analysis revealed that different IC regimens were independent prognostic factors for PFS and DMFS (P = 0.014 and 0.010, respectively).

Conclusion: This study found that compared with the TP regimen, TPF induction chemotherapy is associated with improved survival in patients with locoregionally advanced NPC. TPF can produce more mucosal and nausea/vomiting adverse reactions than TP.

Keywords: fluorouracil; induction chemotherapy; nasopharyngeal carcinoma; propensity score-matching.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Rong‐Hui Zheng and Tai‐Ze Yuan were guarantors of the entire study. Rong‐Hui Zheng, Tai‐Ze Yuan, Ze‐Jiang Zhan and Hao‐Yun Tao built up the study concepts and designed this study. Hao‐Yun Tao, Wen‐Ze Qiu and Kai Liao collected clinical data all needed. Wen‐Ze Qiu and Ya‐Wei Yuan performed the statistical analyses. Rong‐Hui Zheng, Tai‐Ze Yuan, Ze‐Jiang Zhan and Hao‐Yun Tao prepared and edited the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

No conflicts of interest exists.

Figures

FIGURE 1
FIGURE 1
Flow diagram. IC, induction chemotherapy; CCRT, concurrent chemoradiotherapy; TP, cisplatin and docetaxel; TPF, docetaxel, cisplatin and fluorouracil
FIGURE 2
FIGURE 2
Kaplan–Meier survival curves based on the IC regimens of docetaxel and cisplatin (TP) versus docetaxel, cisplatin and fluorouracil (TPF) for the entire cohort. (a) Overall survival; (b) progression‐free survival; (c) distant metastasis‐free survival and (d) locoregional relapse‐free survival [Colour figure can be viewed at wileyonlinelibrary.com]
FIGURE 3
FIGURE 3
Kaplan–Meier survival curves based on the IC regimens of docetaxel and cisplatin (TP) versus docetaxel, cisplatin and fluorouracil (TPF) for the propensity‐matched cohort. (a) Overall survival; (b) progression‐free survival; (c) distant metastasis‐free survival and (d) Locoregional relapse‐free survival [Colour figure can be viewed at wileyonlinelibrary.com]

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Joseph TSW, Tam CH, Susan LEL, et al. Is nasopharyngeal cancer really a “Cantonese cancer”? Chin J Cancer. 2010;29(5):517‐526. - PubMed
    1. Lee AWM, Tung SY, Ng WT, et al. A multicenter, phase 3, randomized trial of concurrent chemoradiotherapy plus adjuvant chemotherapy versus radiotherapy alone in patients with regionally advanced nasopharyngeal carcinoma: 10‐Year outcomes for efficacy and toxicity. Cancer. 2017;123(21):4147‐4157. - PubMed
    1. Wu MY, He XY, Hu CS. Tumor regression and patterns of distant metastasis of T1‐T2 nasopharyngeal carcinoma with intensity‐modulated radiotherapy. PLOS ONE. 2016;11(4):e0154501. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Qiu WZ, Huang PY, Shi JL, et al. Neoadjuvant chemotherapy plus intensity‐modulated radiotherapy versus concurrent chemoradiotherapy plus adjuvant chemotherapy for the treatment of locoregionally advanced nasopharyngeal carcinoma: A retrospective controlled study. Chinese Journal of Cancer. 2016;35:2. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Li WF, Chen L, Sun Y, et al. Induction chemotherapy for locoregionally advanced nasopharyngeal carcinoma. Chin J Cancer. 2016;35(1):94. - PMC - PubMed

MeSH terms