Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Comparative Study
. 2021 Jun:107:201-204.
doi: 10.1016/j.ijid.2021.04.087. Epub 2021 May 1.

Performance of SARS-CoV-2 rapid antigen test compared with real-time RT-PCR in asymptomatic individuals

Affiliations
Comparative Study

Performance of SARS-CoV-2 rapid antigen test compared with real-time RT-PCR in asymptomatic individuals

Mónica Peña et al. Int J Infect Dis. 2021 Jun.

Abstract

Screening, testing and contact tracing plays a pivotal role in control of the COVID-19 pandemic. To enable this it is necessary to increase the testing capacity. This study compared a SARS-CoV-2 rapid antigen test (RAT) and RT-PCR in 842 asymptomatic individuals from Tarapacá, Chile. A sensitivity of 69.86%, specificity of 99.61%, PPV of 94.44% and NPP of 97.22% with Ct values (Ct > 27) that were significantly higher among individuals with false-negative RAT were reported. These results support the fact that RAT might have a significant impact on the identification of asymptomatic carriers in areas that lack suitable laboratories to perform SARS-CoV-2 real-time RT-PCR diagnostics, or the results take more than 24-48 h, as well as zones with high traffic of individuals such as border/customs, airports, interregional bus, train stations or in any mass testing campaign requiring rapid results.

Keywords: Asymptomatic; RAT; RT-PCR; Rapid antigen test; SARS-CoV-2.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
(A) Difference in viral cycle threshold (Ct) value between asymptomatic individuals with positive (black) and negative (red) RAT among real-time RT-PCR-positive (n = 73). Analysis for statistical difference was performed by Wilcoxon test. (B) Plot of K-means clustering results of NSS real-time RT-PCR Ct values used to compare to RAT (black dots: RAT+/red dots: RAT−).

References

    1. Baro B., Rodo P., Ouchi D., Bordoy A.E., Saya Amaro E.N., Salsench S.V., et al. Performance characteristics of five antigen-detecting rapid diagnostic test (Ag-RDT) for SARS-CoV-2 asymptomatic infection: a head-to-head benchmark comparison. J Infect. 2021;82(6):269–275. doi: 10.1016/j.jinf.2021.04.009. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Bullard J., Dust K., Funk D., Strong J.E., Alexander D., Garnett L., et al. Predicting Infectious Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus 2 From Diagnostic Samples. Clin Infect Dis. 2020;71(10):2663–2666. doi: 10.1093/cid/ciaa638. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. CDC . CDC; 2021. Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19): interim guidance for antigen testing for SARS-CoV-2. Revised April 13, 2021.
    1. Cerutti F., Burdino E., Milia M.G., Allice T., Gregori G., Bruzzone B., et al. Urgent need of rapid tests for SARS CoV-2 antigen detection: evaluation of the SD-biosensor antigen test for SARS-CoV-2. J Clin Virol. 2020;132:104654. doi: 10.1016/j.jcv.2020.104654. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Dinnes J., Deeks J.J., Adriano A., Berhane S., Davenport C., Dittrich S., et al. Rapid, point-of-care antigen and molecular-based tests for diagnosis of SARS-CoV-2 infection. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2020;8(8) doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013705. - DOI - PMC - PubMed

Publication types