Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2021 Apr 30;13(9):1452.
doi: 10.3390/polym13091452.

State-of-Art of Standard and Innovative Materials Used in Cranioplasty

Affiliations
Review

State-of-Art of Standard and Innovative Materials Used in Cranioplasty

Valentina Siracusa et al. Polymers (Basel). .

Abstract

Cranioplasty is the surgical technology employed to repair a traumatic head injury, cerebrovascular disease, oncology resection and congenital anomalies. Actually, different bone substitutes are used, either derived from biological products such as hydroxyapatite and demineralized bone matrix or synthetic ones such as sulfate or phosphate ceramics and polymer-based substitutes. Considering that the choice of the best material for cranioplasty is controversial, linked to the best operation procedure, the intent of this review was to report the outcome of research conducted on materials used for such applications, comparing the most used materials. The most interesting challenge is to preserve the mechanical properties while improving the bioactivity, porosity, biocompatibility, antibacterial properties, lowering thickness and costs. Among polymer materials, polymethylmethacrylate and polyetheretherketone are the most motivating, due to their biocompatibility, rigidity and toughness. Other biomaterials, with ecofriendly attributes, such as polycaprolactone and polylactic acid have been investigated, due to their microstructure that mimic the trabecular bone, encouraging vascularization and cell-cell communications. Taking into consideration that each material must be selected for specific clinical use, the main limitation remains the defects and the lack of vascularization, consequently porous synthetic substitutes could be an interesting way to support a faster and wider vascularization, with the aim to improve patient prognosis.

Keywords: biomaterials; cranial defect; cranioplasty; neurosurgery; polycaprolactone (PCL); polyethereketoneketone (PEKK); polyetheretherketone (PEEK); polyglycolide (PGA); polylactic acid (PLA); polymers; polymethylmethacrylate (PMMA); skull reconstruction; synthetic cranioplasty.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Example of causes that require cranioplasty (authors personal database images): (1a) axial computerized tomography (CT) scan of tumor involving cranial bone; (1b) 3D-CT scan of tumor involving cranial bone; (2) 3D-CT scan of depressed skull fracture; (3) surgical exposition of complex depressed skull fracture.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Bone substitutes categories.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Chemical formulas of resorbable biodegradable polymers most commonly used in medicine: polyglycolic acid (PGA), polylactic acid (PLA) and polycaprolactone (PCL).
Figure 4
Figure 4
Cranioplasty in PMMA with titanium fixation plates and screws.
Figure 5
Figure 5
(1) PMMA cranioplasty fractures; (2a) 3D and (2b) axial CT-scan of PMMA cranioplasty displacement.
Figure 6
Figure 6
PEEK and PEKK chemical formulas.
Figure 7
Figure 7
(a) Phantom model for virtual craniotomy; (b) 3D HR CT-scan of Phantom; (c) stealth navigation station; (d) post-operative axial CT-scan.

References

    1. Shah A.M., Jung H., Skirboll S. Materials used in cranioplasty: A history and analysis. Neurosurg. Focus. 2014;36:E19. doi: 10.3171/2014.2.FOCUS13561. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Aydin S., Kucukyuruk B., Abuzayed B., Aydin S., Sanus G.Z. Cranioplasty: Review of materials and techniques. J. Neurosci. Rural. Pr. 2011;2:162–167. doi: 10.4103/0976-3147.83584. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Feroze A.H., Walmsley G.G., Choudhri O., Lorenz H.P., Grant G.A., Edwards M.S.B. Evolution of cranioplasty tech-niques in neurosurgery: Historical review, pediatric considerations, and current trends. J. Neurosurg. 2015;123:1098–1107. doi: 10.3171/2014.11.JNS14622. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Grant G.A., Jolley M., Ellenbogen R.G., Roberts T.S., Gruss J.R., Loeser J.D. Failure of autologous bone-assisted cranio-plasty following decompressive craniectomy in children and adolescents. J. Neurosurg. 2004;100:163–168. - PubMed
    1. Alkhaibary A., Alharbi A., Alnefaie N., Almubarak A.O., Aloraidi A., Khairy S. Cranioplasty: A Comprehensive Re-view of the History, Materials, Surgical Aspects, and Complications. World Neuros. 2020;139:445–452. doi: 10.1016/j.wneu.2020.04.211. - DOI - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources