Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2021 Apr 30;18(9):4807.
doi: 10.3390/ijerph18094807.

A Decision-Tree Approach to Assist in Forecasting the Outcomes of the Neonatal Brain Injury

Affiliations

A Decision-Tree Approach to Assist in Forecasting the Outcomes of the Neonatal Brain Injury

Bogdan Mihai Neamțu et al. Int J Environ Res Public Health. .

Abstract

Neonatal brain injury or neonatal encephalopathy (NE) is a significant morbidity and mortality factor in preterm and full-term newborns. NE has an incidence in the range of 2.5 to 3.5 per 1000 live births carrying a considerable burden for neurological outcomes such as epilepsy, cerebral palsy, cognitive impairments, and hydrocephaly. Many scoring systems based on different risk factor combinations in regression models have been proposed to predict abnormal outcomes. Birthweight, gestational age, Apgar scores, pH, ultrasound and MRI biomarkers, seizures onset, EEG pattern, and seizure duration were the most referred predictors in the literature. Our study proposes a decision-tree approach based on clinical risk factors for abnormal outcomes in newborns with the neurological syndrome to assist in neonatal encephalopathy prognosis as a complementary tool to the acknowledged scoring systems. We retrospectively studied 188 newborns with associated encephalopathy and seizures in the perinatal period. Etiology and abnormal outcomes were assessed through correlations with the risk factors. We computed mean, median, odds ratios values for birth weight, gestational age, 1-min Apgar Score, 5-min Apgar score, seizures onset, and seizures duration monitoring, applying standard statistical methods first. Subsequently, CART (classification and regression trees) and cluster analysis were employed, further adjusting the medians. Out of 188 cases, 84 were associated to abnormal outcomes. The hierarchy on etiology frequencies was dominated by cerebrovascular impairments, metabolic anomalies, and infections. Both preterms and full-terms at risk were bundled in specific categories defined as high-risk 75-100%, intermediate risk 52.9%, and low risk 0-25% after CART algorithm implementation. Cluster analysis illustrated the median values, profiling at a glance the preterm model in high-risk groups and a full-term model in the inter-mediate-risk category. Our study illustrates that, in addition to standard statistics methodologies, decision-tree approaches could provide a first-step tool for the prognosis of the abnormal outcome in newborns with encephalopathy.

Keywords: abnormal outcomes; decision-tree algorithms; neonatal brain injury; neurodevelopment; risk factors; seizures.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
CART output illustrates a four-level decision tree (1–4). The cases partition is based on BW, AS1, AS5, ONS, SDM as prognostic factors related to abnormal outcomes (yes/no). The minimal change selection in impurity was 0.0001, whereas 5/3 were elected as minimal values for parent/child node. The hierarchy consisted of BW at level 1 and 2, SDM at level 2, AS1 and AS 5 at level 3, ONS at level 4.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Cluster analysis for high-risk, intermediate and low-risk categories based on BW, GA, AS1, AS5, ONS, SDM. Median values for the predictors highlight the tendencies for each cluster. We recorded a fair silhouette measure of cohesion and separation for the three clusters (high, intermediate and low risk cases).

References

    1. Kurinczuk J.J., White-Koning M., Badawi N. Epidemiology of neonatal encephalopathy and hypoxic-ischaemic encephalopathy. Early Hum. Dev. 2010;86:329–338. doi: 10.1016/j.earlhumdev.2010.05.010. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Iliodromiti Z., Zygouris D., Karagianni P., Belitsos P., Daniilidis A., Vrachnis N. Neonatal Care, Deborah Raines and Zoe Iliodromiti. IntechOpen; London, England: 2012. Chapter4-brain injury in preterm infants; pp. 73–86. - DOI
    1. Wyatt J.S. Mechanisms of brain injury in the Newborn. Eye. 2007;21:1261–1263. doi: 10.1038/sj.eye.6702848. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Volpe J.J. Brain injury in premature infants: A complex amalgam of destructive and developmental disturbances. Lancet Neurol. 2009;8:110–124. doi: 10.1016/S1474-4422(08)70294-1. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Ambalavanan N., Carlo W.A., Shankaran S., Bann C.M., Emrich S.L., Higgins R.D., Tyson J.E., O’Shea T.M., Laptook A.R., Ehrenkranz R.A., et al. Predicting outcome of neonates diagnosed with hypoxemicischemic encephalopathy. Pediatrics. 2006;118:2084–2093. doi: 10.1542/peds.2006-1591. - DOI - PubMed

Publication types