Mid-term clinical and radiographic outcomes of porous-coated metaphyseal sleeves used in revision total knee arthroplasty
- PMID: 33947470
- PMCID: PMC8097806
- DOI: 10.1186/s43019-021-00103-5
Mid-term clinical and radiographic outcomes of porous-coated metaphyseal sleeves used in revision total knee arthroplasty
Abstract
Background: The management of bone defects remains one of the major challenges surgeons are faced with in revision total knee arthroplasty (RTKA). Large and uncontained bone defects are traditionally managed with metaphyseal sleeves that facilitate osseointegration and have reported construct stability. While many studies have presented excellent short-term outcomes using metaphyseal sleeves, less is known on their performance in the longer term. The purpose of this study was to present our mid-term results of the metaphyseal sleeves used in patients undergoing RTKA.
Materials and methods: Between January 2007 and January 2015, 30 patients underwent RTKA with the use of a CCKMB prosthesis combined with an osteointegrative sleeve. The main indications for RTKA were instability in 40% of the cases (n = 12), aseptic loosening in 30% (n = 9), infection in 26.7% (n = 8), and "other" in 3.3% (n = 1). The minimal follow-up time was 5 years and the mean follow-up time was 82.4 months (SD = 22.6). Clinical outcomes were assessed by Knee Society scores (KSS), range of motion and rate of re-operation.
Results: The mean Knee Society score increased significantly from 72.1 preoperatively to 90.0 postoperatively (p < 0.001). The cumulative incidence of re-operation in our study was 13.3% (n = 4). Our study reported no cases of aseptic loosening or mobile-bearing spin-out. Knee flexion to 90° and more was impossible in seven cases (23.3%) preoperatively and in one case (3.3%) postoperatively.
Conclusion: Porous-coated metaphyseal sleeves demonstrated excellent rates of survivorship and radiographic ingrowth in the mid-term setting. However, further studies are required to assess their outcomes in the long-term.
Keywords: Bone loss; Metaphyseal sleeve; Revision total knee arthroplasty.
Conflict of interest statement
The authors of this study declare that they have no competing interests.
Figures

Similar articles
-
Septic Revision Total Knee Arthroplasty: Treatment of Metaphyseal Bone Defects Using Metaphyseal Sleeves.J Arthroplasty. 2018 Dec;33(12):3734-3738. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2018.08.017. Epub 2018 Aug 24. J Arthroplasty. 2018. PMID: 30224100
-
Excellent mid-term osseointegration and implant survival using metaphyseal sleeves in revision total knee arthroplasty.Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2020 Dec;28(12):3843-3848. doi: 10.1007/s00167-020-05865-1. Epub 2020 Jan 31. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2020. PMID: 32006076 Free PMC article.
-
Mid-term Survivorship and Functional Outcomes of Metaphyseal Sleeves for Addressing Anderson Orthopaedic Research Institute (AORI) Type 2 and 3 Bone Defects in Revision Total Knee Arthroplasty.Cureus. 2024 Sep 13;16(9):e69381. doi: 10.7759/cureus.69381. eCollection 2024 Sep. Cureus. 2024. PMID: 39403644 Free PMC article.
-
Metaphyseal cones and sleeves in revision total knee arthroplasty: Two sides of the same coin? Complications, clinical and radiological results-a systematic review of the literature.Musculoskelet Surg. 2020 Apr;104(1):25-35. doi: 10.1007/s12306-019-00598-y. Epub 2019 Mar 16. Musculoskelet Surg. 2020. PMID: 30879231
-
Management of bone loss in revision total knee arthroplasty: therapeutic options and results.EFORT Open Rev. 2021 Nov 19;6(11):1073-1086. doi: 10.1302/2058-5241.6.210007. eCollection 2021 Nov. EFORT Open Rev. 2021. PMID: 34909226 Free PMC article. Review.
Cited by
-
Is the patient aware of the difference between resurfaced and nonresurfaced patella after bilateral total knee arthroplasty? A systematic review of simultaneous bilateral randomized trials.Knee Surg Relat Res. 2022 Feb 14;34(1):4. doi: 10.1186/s43019-022-00133-7. Knee Surg Relat Res. 2022. PMID: 35164884 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Does stem profile have an impact on the failure patterns in revision total knee arthroplasty?Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2023 Mar;143(3):1549-1569. doi: 10.1007/s00402-022-04683-z. Epub 2022 Nov 30. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2023. PMID: 36450936 Free PMC article.
-
Cones and sleeves present good survival and clinical outcome in revision total knee arthroplasty: a meta-analysis.Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2022 Aug;30(8):2824-2837. doi: 10.1007/s00167-021-06670-0. Epub 2021 Aug 13. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2022. PMID: 34389876 Free PMC article.
-
Excellent mid- to long-term survival of tantalum metal cones in a case series of revision knee arthroplasty with severe bony defects.Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2023 Dec;31(12):5496-5506. doi: 10.1007/s00167-023-07593-8. Epub 2023 Oct 11. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2023. PMID: 37819600 Free PMC article.
-
[Bone defect management in revision knee arthroplasty].Orthopade. 2021 Dec;50(12):1004-1010. doi: 10.1007/s00132-021-04181-x. Epub 2021 Oct 15. Orthopade. 2021. PMID: 34654936 Review. German.
References
-
- Losina E, Thornhill TS, Rome BN, Wright J, Katz JN. The dramatic increase in total knee replacement utilization rates in the United States cannot be fully explained by growth in population size and the obesity epidemic. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2012;94(3):201–207. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.J.01958. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
-
- Kurtz SM, Ong KL, Schmier J, Mowat F, Saleh K, Dybvik E, et al. Future clinical and economic impact of revision total hip and knee arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2007;89(Suppl 3):144–151. - PubMed
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources