Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2020 Jul 16;5(1):e20.
doi: 10.1017/cts.2020.512.

Enhancing reproducibility using interprofessional team best practices

Affiliations

Enhancing reproducibility using interprofessional team best practices

Betsy Rolland et al. J Clin Transl Sci. .

Abstract

The pervasive problem of irreproducibility of preclinical research represents a substantial threat to the translation of CTSA-generated health interventions. Key stakeholders in the research process have proposed solutions to this challenge to encourage research practices that improve reproducibility. However, these proposals have had minimal impact, because they either 1. take place too late in the research process, 2. focus exclusively on the products of research instead of the processes of research, and/or 3. fail to take into account the driving incentives in the research enterprise. Because so much clinical and translational science is team-based, CTSA hubs have a unique opportunity to leverage Science of Team Science research to implement and support innovative, evidence-based, team-focused, reproducibility-enhancing activities at a project's start, and across its evolution. Here, we describe the impact of irreproducibility on clinical and translational science, review its origins, and then describe stakeholders' efforts to impact reproducibility, and why those efforts may not have the desired effect. Based on team-science best practices and principles of scientific integrity, we then propose ways for Translational Teams to build reproducible behaviors. We end with suggestions for how CTSAs can leverage team-based best practices and identify observable behaviors that indicate a culture of reproducible research.

Keywords: Team science; ethics; interprofessional teams; reproducibility; translational teams.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors have no conflicts of interest to declare.

Figures

Fig. 1.
Fig. 1.
Lifecycle of a preclinical research project. Shown is a schematic view of the lifecycle of a preclinical research project related to the four developmental phases of a translational team. Behaviors for each reproducibility domain are indicated. Team behaviors that reinforce good institutional practices of reproducible science are indicated.
Fig. 2.
Fig. 2.
Best practices in reproducible team science support the culture of good institutional practices (GIPs). Mapping the best practices in reproducible team science with the six GIPs proposed by Begley et al.

References

    1. Begley CG, Ioannidis JP. Reproducibility in science: improving the standard for basic and preclinical research. Circulation Research 2015; 116(1) :116–126. - PubMed
    1. Prinz F, Schlange T, Asadullah K. Believe it or not: how much can we rely on published data on potential drug targets? Nature Reviews Drug Discovery 2011; 10(9): 712. - PubMed
    1. Freedman LP, Cockburn IM, Simcoe TS. The economics of reproducibility in preclinical research. PLoS Biology 2015; 13(6): e1002165. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Perel P, et al. Comparison of treatment effects between animal experiments and clinical trials: systematic review. BMJ 2007; 334(7586): 197. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Chan AW, et al. Increasing value and reducing waste: addressing inaccessible research. Lancet 2014; 383(9913): 257–266. - PMC - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources