Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2020 Aug 25;5(1):e37.
doi: 10.1017/cts.2020.530.

Understanding shared decision-making experience among vulnerable population: Focus group with food bank clients

Affiliations

Understanding shared decision-making experience among vulnerable population: Focus group with food bank clients

Young Ji Lee et al. J Clin Transl Sci. .

Abstract

Introduction: Shared decision-making (SDM) is a critical component of delivering patient-centered care. Members of vulnerable populations may play a passive role in clinical decision-making; therefore, understanding their prior decision-making experiences is a key step to engaging them in SDM.

Objective: To understand the previous healthcare experiences and current expectations of vulnerable populations on clinical decision-making regarding therapeutic options.

Methods: Clients of a local food bank were recruited to participate in focus groups. Participants were asked to share prior health decision experiences, explain difficulties they faced when making a therapeutic decision, describe features of previous satisfactory decision-making processes, share factors under consideration when choosing between treatment options, and suggest tools that would help them to communicate with healthcare providers. We used the inductive content analysis to interpret data gathered from the focus groups.

Results: Twenty-six food bank clients participated in four focus groups. All participants lived in areas of socioeconomic disadvantage. Four themes emerged: prior negative clinical decision-making experience with providers, patients preparing to engage in SDM, challenges encountered during the decision-making process, and patients' expectations of decision aids. Participants also reported they were unable to discuss therapeutic options at the time of decision-making. They also expressed financial concerns and the need for sufficiently detailed information to evaluate risks.

Conclusion: Our findings suggest the necessity of developing decision aids that would improve the engagement of vulnerable populations in the SDM process, including consideration of affordability, use of patient-friendly language, and incorporation of drug-drug and drug-food interactions information.

Keywords: Decision making; community-based participatory research; decision aids; focus groups; shared; vulnerable populations.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors have no conflicts of interest to declare.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Barry MJ, Edgman-Levitan S. Shared decision making—The pinnacle of patient-centered care. New England Journal of Medicine 2012; 366(9): 780–781. - PubMed
    1. Elwyn G, et al. Shared decision making: a model for clinical practice. Journal of General Internal Medicine 2012; 27(10): 1361–1367. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Allen LA, et al. Decision making in advanced heart failure: a scientific statement from the American Heart Association. Circulation. 2012; 125(15): 1928–1952. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Simmons M, Hetrick S, Jorm A. Shared decision-making: benefits, barriers and current opportunities for application. Australas Psychiatry. 2010; 18(5): 394–397. - PubMed
    1. Oshima Lee E, Emanuel EJ. Shared decision making to improve care and reduce costs. New England Journal of Medicine 2013; 368(1): 6–8. - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources