Understanding shared decision-making experience among vulnerable population: Focus group with food bank clients
- PMID: 33948259
- PMCID: PMC8057450
- DOI: 10.1017/cts.2020.530
Understanding shared decision-making experience among vulnerable population: Focus group with food bank clients
Abstract
Introduction: Shared decision-making (SDM) is a critical component of delivering patient-centered care. Members of vulnerable populations may play a passive role in clinical decision-making; therefore, understanding their prior decision-making experiences is a key step to engaging them in SDM.
Objective: To understand the previous healthcare experiences and current expectations of vulnerable populations on clinical decision-making regarding therapeutic options.
Methods: Clients of a local food bank were recruited to participate in focus groups. Participants were asked to share prior health decision experiences, explain difficulties they faced when making a therapeutic decision, describe features of previous satisfactory decision-making processes, share factors under consideration when choosing between treatment options, and suggest tools that would help them to communicate with healthcare providers. We used the inductive content analysis to interpret data gathered from the focus groups.
Results: Twenty-six food bank clients participated in four focus groups. All participants lived in areas of socioeconomic disadvantage. Four themes emerged: prior negative clinical decision-making experience with providers, patients preparing to engage in SDM, challenges encountered during the decision-making process, and patients' expectations of decision aids. Participants also reported they were unable to discuss therapeutic options at the time of decision-making. They also expressed financial concerns and the need for sufficiently detailed information to evaluate risks.
Conclusion: Our findings suggest the necessity of developing decision aids that would improve the engagement of vulnerable populations in the SDM process, including consideration of affordability, use of patient-friendly language, and incorporation of drug-drug and drug-food interactions information.
Keywords: Decision making; community-based participatory research; decision aids; focus groups; shared; vulnerable populations.
© The Association for Clinical and Translational Science 2020.
Conflict of interest statement
The authors have no conflicts of interest to declare.
Similar articles
-
A qualitative systematic review of internal and external influences on shared decision-making in all health care settings.JBI Libr Syst Rev. 2012;10(58):4633-4646. doi: 10.11124/jbisrir-2012-432. JBI Libr Syst Rev. 2012. PMID: 27820528
-
Toward Optimal Decision Making among Vulnerable Patients Referred for Cardiac Surgery: A Qualitative Analysis of Patient and Provider Perspectives.Med Decis Making. 2017 Jul;37(5):600-610. doi: 10.1177/0272989X16675338. Epub 2016 Nov 2. Med Decis Making. 2017. PMID: 27803362
-
Experiences of shared decision-making in community rehabilitation: a focused ethnography.BMC Health Serv Res. 2020 Apr 19;20(1):329. doi: 10.1186/s12913-020-05223-4. BMC Health Serv Res. 2020. PMID: 32306972 Free PMC article.
-
Key Elements of Mammography Shared Decision-Making: a Scoping Review of the Literature.J Gen Intern Med. 2018 Oct;33(10):1805-1814. doi: 10.1007/s11606-018-4576-6. Epub 2018 Jul 20. J Gen Intern Med. 2018. PMID: 30030738 Free PMC article.
-
Decisions With Patients, Not for Patients: Shared Decision-Making in Allergy and Immunology.J Allergy Clin Immunol Pract. 2024 Oct;12(10):2625-2633. doi: 10.1016/j.jaip.2024.05.046. Epub 2024 Jun 6. J Allergy Clin Immunol Pract. 2024. PMID: 38851489 Review.
Cited by
-
Twenty-one years of the International Shared Decision Making Conference: lessons learnt and future priorities.BMJ Evid Based Med. 2024 May 22;29(3):151-155. doi: 10.1136/bmjebm-2023-112374. BMJ Evid Based Med. 2024. PMID: 37491143 Free PMC article. No abstract available.
-
Mixed-Method Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Shared Decision-Making Tools for Cancer Screening.Cancers (Basel). 2023 Jul 29;15(15):3867. doi: 10.3390/cancers15153867. Cancers (Basel). 2023. PMID: 37568683 Free PMC article. Review.
References
-
- Barry MJ, Edgman-Levitan S. Shared decision making—The pinnacle of patient-centered care. New England Journal of Medicine 2012; 366(9): 780–781. - PubMed
-
- Simmons M, Hetrick S, Jorm A. Shared decision-making: benefits, barriers and current opportunities for application. Australas Psychiatry. 2010; 18(5): 394–397. - PubMed
-
- Oshima Lee E, Emanuel EJ. Shared decision making to improve care and reduce costs. New England Journal of Medicine 2013; 368(1): 6–8. - PubMed
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources