Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Multicenter Study
. 2021 Jun;197(6):463-473.
doi: 10.1007/s00066-021-01772-7. Epub 2021 May 5.

New clinical data on human spinal cord re-irradiation tolerance

Affiliations
Multicenter Study

New clinical data on human spinal cord re-irradiation tolerance

Hiroshi Doi et al. Strahlenther Onkol. 2021 Jun.

Abstract

Purpose: To provide additional clinical data about the re-irradiation tolerance of the spinal cord.

Methods: This was a retrospective bi-institutional study of patients re-irradiated to the cervical or thoracic spinal cord with minimum follow-up of 6 months. The maximum dose (Dmax) and dose to 0.1cc (D0.1cc) were determined (magnetic resonance imaging [MRI]-defined cord) and expressed as equivalent dose in 2‑Gy fractions (EQD2) with an α/β value of 2 Gy.

Results: All 32 patients remained free from radiation myelopathy after a median follow-up of 12 months. Re-irradiation was performed after 6-97 months (median 15). In 22 cases (69%) the re-irradiation spinal cord EQD2 Dmax was higher than that of the first treatment course. Forty-eight of 64 treatment courses employed fraction sizes of 2.5 to 4 Gy to the target volume. The median cumulative spinal cord EQD2 Dmax was 80.7 Gy, minimum 61.12 Gy, maximum 114.79 Gy. The median cumulative spinal cord D0.1cc EQD2 was 76.1 Gy, minimum 61.12 Gy, maximum 95.62 Gy. Besides cumulative dose, other risk factors for myelopathy were present (single-course Dmax EQD2 ≥51 Gy in 9 patients, single-course D0.1cc EQD2 ≥51 Gy in 5 patients).

Conclusion: Even patients treated to higher cumulative doses than previously recommended, or at a considerable risk of myelopathy according to a published risk score, remained free from this complication, although one must acknowledge the potential for manifestation of damage in patients currently alive, i.e., still at risk. Individualized decisions to re-irradiate after appropriate informed consent are an acceptable strategy, including scenarios where low re-irradiation doses to the spinal cord would compromise target coverage and tumor control probability to an unacceptable degree.

Keywords: Dose constraint; Palliative radiotherapy; Radiation myelopathy; Spinal metastases; Treatment planning.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

H. Doi, K. Tamari, R.-J. Oh, and C. Nieder declare that they have no competing interests.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Medin PM, Foster RD, van der Kogel AJ, et al. Spinal cord tolerance to reirradiation with single-fraction radiosurgery: a swine model. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2012;83:1031–1037. doi: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2011.08.030. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Ang KK, Jiang GL, Feng Y, et al. Extent and kinetics of recovery of occult spinal cord injury. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2001;50:1013–1020. doi: 10.1016/S0360-3016(01)01599-1. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Folkert MR, Bilsky MH, Cohen GN, et al. Intraoperative and percutaneous iridium-192 high-dose-rate brachytherapy for previously irradiated lesions of the spine. Brachytherapy. 2013;12:449–456. doi: 10.1016/j.brachy.2013.01.162. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Myrehaug S, Sahgal A, Hayashi M, et al. Reirradiation spine stereotactic body radiation therapy for spinal metastases: systematic review. J Neurosurg Spine. 2017;27:428–435. doi: 10.3171/2017.2.SPINE16976. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Zschaeck S, Wust P, Graf R, et al. Spinal cord constraints in the era of high-precision radiotherapy: retrospective analysis of 62 spinal/paraspinal lesions with possible infringements of spinal cord constraints within a minimal volume. Strahlenther Onkol. 2017;193:561–569. doi: 10.1007/s00066-017-1138-5. - DOI - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms

LinkOut - more resources