MRD Assessment in Multiple Myeloma: Progress and Challenges
- PMID: 33950462
- DOI: 10.1007/s11899-021-00633-5
MRD Assessment in Multiple Myeloma: Progress and Challenges
Abstract
Purpose of review: Over the last decade, the development of effective treatment approaches for multiple myeloma (MM) has been associated with higher response rates and longer survival. In patients who achieve complete response, several high sensitivity techniques have been studied to assess minimal residual disease (MRD) and detect residual neoplastic cells within the bone marrow (by flow cytometry or molecular biology techniques) or outside the bone marrow (by imaging or circulating disease markers in the peripheral blood). This is of utmost importance, since residual disease can drive clinical relapse. This review focuses on the progress made in the assessment of MRD in MM.
Recent findings: The achievement of MRD negativity after therapy is considered prognostically important for MM patients, and data from clinical trials and meta-analyses have confirmed that it is strongly associated with better survival. Along with well-known techniques, such as next-generation sequencing (NGS), next-generation flow (NGF), and positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT), other methods such as mass spectrometry (MS) and circulating tumor cells are under study. Intensive treatment regimens at diagnosis can lead up to 70% of MRD negativity in MM patients, although the current proportion of curable patients is still unknown. Today, clinicians who treat MM deal with MRD assessment in routine clinical practice. Its appropriate use in therapeutic decision making may be the most fascinating and challenging issue to be addressed over the next few years.
Keywords: Mass spectrometry (MS); Multiple myeloma; minimal residual disease (MRD); Next-generation flow (NGF); Next-generation sequencing (NGS); Positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT).
References
Papers of particular interest, published recently, have been highlighted as: • Of importance •• Of major importance
-
- •• Munshi NC, Avet-Loiseau H, Anderson KC, et al. A large meta-analysis establishes the role of MRD negativity in long-term survival outcomes in patients with multiple myeloma. Blood Adv. 2020;4:5988–99 A recent meta-analysis on around 8000 patients from different MRD studies, confirming the important prognostic impact of the achievement of MRD negativity, regardless of the adopted method (next-generation sequencing [NGS] or multiparameter flow cytometry [MFC]), time point, and setting (diagnosis or relapse). - PubMed - PMC
-
- Oliva S, D’Agostino M, Boccadoro M, Larocca A. Clinical applications and future directions of minimal residual disease testing in multiple myeloma. Front Oncol. 2020;10. https://doi.org/10.3389/fonc.2020.00001 .
-
- Kumar S, Paiva B, Anderson KC, Durie B, Landgren O, Moreau P, et al. International Myeloma Working Group consensus criteria for response and minimal residual disease assessment in multiple myeloma. Lancet Oncol. 2016;17:e328–46. - PubMed
-
- •• Costa LJ, Derman BA, Bal S, et al. International harmonization in performing and reporting minimal residual disease assessment in multiple myeloma trials. Leukemia. 2021;35:18–30 An international expert consensus on how to report MRD analysis, to foster the standardization and comparison among different studies. - PubMed
-
- Flores-Montero J, de Tute R, Paiva B, Perez JJ, Böttcher S, Wind H, et al. Immunophenotype of normal vs. myeloma plasma cells: toward antibody panel specifications for MRD detection in multiple myeloma. Cytometry B Clin Cytom. 2016;90:61–72. - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical
Research Materials

