Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2021 May 5;16(5):e0251190.
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0251190. eCollection 2021.

Couples' decision-making on post-partum family planning and antenatal counselling in Uganda: A qualitative study

Merlin L Willcox  1   2 , Vincent Mubangizi  3 , Silvia Natukunda  3 , Judith Owokuhaisa  3 , Haeven Nahabwe  4 , Florence Nakaggwa  5 , Matthew Laughton  1 , Isabella Chambers  6 , Sabine Coates  6 , Emma King  2 , Emma Fall  2 , Ingrid Muller  1 , Clare Goodhart  2 , Jonathan Graffy  7
Affiliations

Couples' decision-making on post-partum family planning and antenatal counselling in Uganda: A qualitative study

Merlin L Willcox et al. PLoS One. .

Abstract

Background: Although health workers have been trained to provide post-partum family planning (PPFP), uptake remains low in Uganda. An important reason is that women want the agreement of their partner, who is often absent at the time of delivery. In order to address this, we aimed to understand the views of couples and explore barriers and facilitators to implementation of antenatal couples' counselling on PPFP in Uganda.

Methods: We conducted individual interviews with a purposive sample of 12 postpartum and 3 antenatal couples; and 34 focus groups with a total of 323 participants (68 adolescent women, 83 women aged 20-49, 79 men, 93 health workers) in four contrasting communities (urban and rural) in South-West and Central Uganda. These were recorded, transcribed, translated, and analysed thematically.

Results: Although most participants felt that it is important for partners to discuss family planning, half of the couples were unaware of each other's views on contraception. Most had similar views on motivation to use family planning but not on preferred contraceptive methods. Most liked the idea of antenatal couples' counselling on PPFP. The main barrier was the reluctance of men to attend antenatal clinics (ANC) in health facilities. Respondents felt that Village Health Teams (VHTs) could provide initial counselling on PPFP in couples' homes (with telephone support from health workers, if needed) and encourage men to attend ANC. Suggested facilitators for men to attend ANC included health workers being more welcoming, holding ANC clinics at weekends and "outreach" clinics (in rural villages far from health facilities).

Conclusion: Antenatal couples' counselling has the potential to facilitate agreement PPFP, but some men are reluctant to attend antenatal clinics. Counselling at home by VHTs as well as simple changes to the organisation of antenatal clinics, could make it possible to deliver antenatal couples' counselling on PPFP.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

CG, JG, HN, MW and VM were collaborators in a project entitled “RCGP / Bwindi Community Hospital Partnership to strengthen the capacity of the health system in South-West Uganda to promote sexual and reproductive health”, which received funding from UKAID, through the Tropical Health Education Trust (THET, https://www.thet.org/). MW, VM, HN, FN, SN, IM and CG were collaborators in the “Family Planning: Fact or Fiction?” project, funded under the Medical Research Council – Arts and Humanities Research Council (MRC-AHRC) Global Public Health: Partnership Awards scheme (Grant Ref: MC_PC_MR/R024693/1). https://mrc.ukri.org/ MW has received an Academic Clinical Lectureship (CL-2016-26-005) from the National Institute for Health Research (https://www.nihr.ac.uk/). This does not alter our adherence to PLOS ONE policies on sharing data and materials. MW, VM, HN, FN, SN, IM and CG were collaborators in the “Family Planning: Fact or Fiction?” project, funded under the Medical Research Council – Arts and Humanities Research Council (MRC-AHRC) Global Public Health: Partnership Awards scheme (Grant Ref: MC_PC_MR/R024693/1). https://mrc.ukri.org/ MW has received an Academic Clinical Lectureship (CL-2016-26-005) from the National Institute for Health Research (https://www.nihr.ac.uk/).

References

    1. Conde-Agudelo A, Belizán JM. Maternal morbidity and mortality associated with interpregnancy interval: cross sectional study. British Medical Journal. 2000;321(7271):1255–9. 10.1136/bmj.321.7271.1255 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Conde-Agudelo A, Rosas-Bermudez A, Kafury-Goeta AC. Birth spacing and risk of adverse perinatal outcomes: a meta-analysis. Journal of the American Medical Association. 2006;295(15):1809–23. 10.1001/jama.295.15.1809 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Uganda Bureau of Statistics—UBOS, ICF. Uganda Demographic and Health Survey 2016. Kampala, Uganda: UBOS and ICF; 2018.
    1. Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists. Best practice in postpartum family planning. London: Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists; 2015.
    1. Averbach S, Kakaire O, Kayiga H, Lester F, Sokoloff A, Byamugisha J, et al. Immediate versus delayed postpartum use of levonorgestrel contraceptive implants: a randomized controlled trial in Uganda. American Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology. 2017;217(5):568.e1–.e7. 10.1016/j.ajog.2017.06.005 - DOI - PMC - PubMed

Publication types