Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Meta-Analysis
. 2021 May 5;50(3):733-743.
doi: 10.1093/ageing/afaa224.

Diagnostic accuracy of the 4AT for delirium detection in older adults: systematic review and meta-analysis

Zoë Tieges  1   2 , Alasdair M J Maclullich  1 , Atul Anand  1   3 , Claire Brookes  4 , Marica Cassarino  4 , Margaret O'connor  5 , Damien Ryan  6   7 , Thomas Saller  8 , Rakesh C Arora  9   10 , Yue Chang  9 , Kathryn Agarwal  11   12 , George Taffet  11   12 , Terence Quinn  13 , Susan D Shenkin  1 , Rose Galvin  4
Affiliations
Meta-Analysis

Diagnostic accuracy of the 4AT for delirium detection in older adults: systematic review and meta-analysis

Zoë Tieges et al. Age Ageing. .

Abstract

Objective: Detection of delirium in hospitalised older adults is recommended in national and international guidelines. The 4 'A's Test (4AT) is a short (<2 minutes) instrument for delirium detection that is used internationally as a standard tool in clinical practice. We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis of diagnostic test accuracy of the 4AT for delirium detection.

Methods: We searched MEDLINE, EMBASE, PsycINFO, CINAHL, clinicaltrials.gov and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, from 2011 (year of 4AT release on the website www.the4AT.com) until 21 December 2019. Inclusion criteria were: older adults (≥65 years); diagnostic accuracy study of the 4AT index test when compared to delirium reference standard (standard diagnostic criteria or validated tool). Methodological quality was assessed using the Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies-2 tool. Pooled estimates of sensitivity and specificity were generated from a bivariate random effects model.

Results: Seventeen studies (3,702 observations) were included. Settings were acute medicine, surgery, a care home and the emergency department. Three studies assessed performance of the 4AT in stroke. The overall prevalence of delirium was 24.2% (95% CI 17.8-32.1%; range 10.5-61.9%). The pooled sensitivity was 0.88 (95% CI 0.80-0.93) and the pooled specificity was 0.88 (95% CI 0.82-0.92). Excluding the stroke studies, the pooled sensitivity was 0.86 (95% CI 0.77-0.92) and the pooled specificity was 0.89 (95% CI 0.83-0.93). The methodological quality of studies varied but was moderate to good overall.

Conclusions: The 4AT shows good diagnostic test accuracy for delirium in the 17 available studies. These findings support its use in routine clinical practice in delirium detection.

Prospero registration number: CRD42019133702.

Keywords: 4AT; delirium; dementia; older patients; screening tool; systematic review.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
PRISMA flow chart diagram for the search and study selection process.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Risk of bias and applicability concerns summary (see Appendix S3 for QUADAS-2 assessment criteria).
Figure 3
Figure 3
Hierarchical Summary Receiver Operating Characteristic (HSROC) curve of the 4AT for identifying individuals with delirium.
See this image and copyright information in PMC

References

    1. Rieck KM, Pagali S, Miller DM. Delirium in hospitalized older adults. Hosp Pract (1995) 2020; 48: 3–16. - PubMed
    1. Gibb K, Seeley A, Quinn Tet al. . The consistent burden in published estimates of delirium occurrence in medical inpatients over four decades: a systematic review and meta-analysis study. Age Ageing 2020; 49: 352–60. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Koirala B, Hansen BR, Hosie Aet al. . Delirium point prevalence studies in inpatient settings: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Clin Nurs 2020; 9: 2083–92. - PubMed
    1. Wilson JE, Mart MD, Cunningham C, Shehabi Y, Girard T, MacLullich AMJ, Slooter AJC, Ely EW. (In press). Delirium. Nature Reviews Disease Primers. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Scottish Intercollegiate Guidelins Network (SIGN) . Risk reduction and management of delirium. Edinburgh: 2019. https://www.sign.ac.uk/sign-157-delirium. (accessed 10 June 2020). - PMC - PubMed

Publication types