Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2021 Jun;12(3):538-554.
doi: 10.1002/jcsm.12709. Epub 2021 May 5.

Mouse models of sarcopenia: classification and evaluation

Affiliations
Review

Mouse models of sarcopenia: classification and evaluation

Wen-Qing Xie et al. J Cachexia Sarcopenia Muscle. 2021 Jun.

Abstract

Sarcopenia is a progressive and widespread skeletal muscle disease that is related to an increased possibility of adverse consequences such as falls, fractures, physical disabilities and death, and its risk increases with age. With the deepening of the understanding of sarcopenia, the disease has become a major clinical disease of the elderly and a key challenge of healthy ageing. However, the exact molecular mechanism of this disease is still unclear, and the selection of treatment strategies and the evaluation of its effect are not the same. Most importantly, the early symptoms of this disease are not obvious and are easy to ignore. In addition, the clinical manifestations of each patient are not exactly the same, which makes it difficult to effectively study the progression of sarcopenia. Therefore, it is necessary to develop and use animal models to understand the pathophysiology of sarcopenia and develop therapeutic strategies. This paper reviews the mouse models that can be used in the study of sarcopenia, including ageing models, genetically engineered models, hindlimb suspension models, chemical induction models, denervation models, and immobilization models; analyses their advantages and disadvantages and application scope; and finally summarizes the evaluation of sarcopenia in mouse models.

Keywords: Ageing; Chemical induction; Genetic engineering; Hindlimb unloading; Mouse model; Sarcopenia.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
The commonly used evaluation methods of the mouse model of sarcopenia. CT, computed tomography; CFAB, comprehensive functional assessment battery; DXA, dual X‐ray absorptiometry; MRI, magnetic resonance imaging.

References

    1. Rosenberg IH. Sarcopenia: origins and clinical relevance. J Nutr 1997;127:990s–991s. - PubMed
    1. Cruz‐Jentoft AJ, Baeyens JP, Bauer JM, Boirie Y, Cederholm T, Landi F, et al. Sarcopenia: European consensus on definition and diagnosis: report of the European Working Group on Sarcopenia in Older People. Age Ageing 2010;39:412–423. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Cruz‐Jentoft AJ, Bahat G, Bauer J, Boirie Y, Bruyère O, Cederholm T, et al. Sarcopenia: revised European consensus on definition and diagnosis. Age Ageing 2019;48:16–31. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Manini TM, Clark BC. Letter to the editor: results from a web‐based survey to identify dynapenia screening tools and risk factors. J Cachexia Sarcopenia Muscle 2016;7:499–500. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Mitchell WK, Williams J, Atherton P, Larvin M, Lund J, Narici M. Sarcopenia, dynapenia, and the impact of advancing age on human skeletal muscle size and strength; a quantitative review. Front Physiol 2012;3:260. - PMC - PubMed

Publication types