Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2021 May 5;11(5):e046098.
doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-046098.

Prospective cohort study comparing a triceps-sparing and triceps-detaching approach in total elbow arthroplasty: a protocol

Collaborators, Affiliations

Prospective cohort study comparing a triceps-sparing and triceps-detaching approach in total elbow arthroplasty: a protocol

Danielle Meijering et al. BMJ Open. .

Abstract

Background: New surgical approaches have been developed to optimise elbow function after total elbow arthroplasty (TEA). Currently, there is no consensus on the best surgical approach. This study aims to investigate the functional outcomes, prosthetic component position and complication rates after a triceps-sparing and a triceps-detaching approach in TEA.

Methods and analysis: A multicentre prospective comparative cohort study will be conducted. All patients with an indication for primary TEA will enrol in either the triceps-sparing or the triceps-detaching cohort. Primary outcome measure is elbow function, specified as fixed flexion deformity. Secondary outcome parameters are self-reported and objectively measured physical functioning, including triceps force, prosthetic component position in standard radiographs and complications.

Discussion: The successful completion of this study will clarify which surgical approach yields better functional outcomes, better prosthetic component position and lower complication rates in patients with a TEA.

Ethics and dissemination: The Medical Ethics Review Board of University Medical Center Groningen reviewed the study and concluded that it is not clinical research with human subjects as meant in the Medical Research Involving Human Subjects Act (WMO), therefore WMO approval is not needed (METc2019/544).

Trial registration number: NTR NL8488.

Keywords: adult orthopaedics; clinical trials; elbow & shoulder; limb reconstruction; musculoskeletal disorders; orthopaedic & trauma surgery.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Competing interests: DE disclosed the following financial relationships with commercial entities that produce healthcare-related products or services: institutional research support, Matthys; institutional research support, Zimmer-Biomet; institutional research support, Stryker; speaker/teacher for AO and IBRA courses; advisory board member for Lima Corporates. None related to this manuscript.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Study procedures.

References

    1. Welsink CL, Lambers KTA, van Deurzen DFP, et al. . Total elbow arthroplasty: a systematic review. JBJS Rev 2017;5:e4. 10.2106/JBJS.RVW.16.00089 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Voloshin I, Schippert DW, Kakar S, et al. . Complications of total elbow replacement: a systematic review. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 2011;20:158–68. 10.1016/j.jse.2010.08.026 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Lenoir H, Micallef JP, Djerbi I, et al. . Total elbow arthroplasty: influence of implant positioning on functional outcomes. Orthop Traumatol Surg Res 2015;101:721–7. 10.1016/j.otsr.2015.07.008 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Dachs RP, Fleming MA, Chivers DA, et al. . Total elbow arthroplasty: outcomes after triceps-detaching and triceps-sparing approaches. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 2015;24:339–47. 10.1016/j.jse.2014.11.038 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Studer A, Athwal GS, MacDermid JC, et al. . The lateral para-olecranon approach for total elbow arthroplasty. J Hand Surg Am 2013;38:2219–26. 10.1016/j.jhsa.2013.07.029 - DOI - PubMed

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources