Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2021 May 5;7(1):47.
doi: 10.1038/s41523-021-00246-4.

PONDx: real-life utilization and decision impact of the 21-gene assay on clinical practice in Italy

Affiliations

PONDx: real-life utilization and decision impact of the 21-gene assay on clinical practice in Italy

Francesco Cognetti et al. NPJ Breast Cancer. .

Abstract

Clinicopathological prognostic features have limited value to identify with precision newly diagnosed patients with hormone receptor (HR)-positive, HER2-negative breast cancer (BC), who would benefit from chemotherapy (CT) in addition to adjuvant hormonal therapy (HT). The 21-gene Oncotype DX Breast Recurrence Score® (RS) assay has been demonstrated to predict CT benefit, hence supporting personalized decisions on adjuvant CT. The multicenter, prospective, observational study PONDx investigated the real-life use of RS® results in Italy and its impact on treatment decisions. Physicians' treatment recommendations (HT ± CT) were documented before and after availability of RS results, and changes in recommendations were determined. In the HR+ HER2- early BC population studied (N = 1738), physicians recommended CT + HT in 49% of patients pre-RS. RS-guided treatment decisions resulted in 36% reduction of CT recommendations. PONDx confirms that RS results provide clinically relevant information for CT recommendation in early-stage BC, resulting in a reduction of more than a third of CT use.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

F.C.: Genomic Health, Inc., Roche, Eli Lilly, Bayer, Novartis, Amgen, Pfizer, Astra Zeneca, Eisai, Merch-Serono, Boheringer Ingelheim, MSD, BMS, Takeda, Astellas Oncology, Abbott. S.B.: Genomic Health, Inc. A.F.: Roche, Celgene, Astra Zeneca, Eli Lilly, Novartis, Pfizer, Eisai. M.G.: Roche, Pfizer, Astra Zeneca, Novartis, Celgene, Eli, Lilly, Amgen, and Eisai. M.C.: Novartis, Pierre Fabre, Pfizer, OBI Pharma, Puma Biotechnology, Celldex, Astra zeneca. A.Z.: Roche, Astra Zeneca, Novartis, Eli Lilly, Pfizer. D.G.: Eli Lilly, Novartis, Pfizer, Eisai. D.A.: Genomic Health, Inc. G.N.: Pfizer, Genomic Health, Inc., Italfarmaco. P.V.: Eisai, Roche, Pfizer, Novartis, Gentili. D.C.: Novartis, Roche. G.B.: Eli Lilly, Novartis. G.T.: Novartis Pfizer Italfarmaco e Molteni. T.G.: Novartis Roche Celgine Pfeizer Lilly Gentili. G.C., R.M., D.F., A.R., P.S., F.S., L. Vigna, C.T., D.S., M.A.F., E.M., G.S., G.P., A.F.S., R.B., and L. Vassalli declare no competing interests.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1. Changes in treatment recommendations before and after availability of the Recurrence Score result.
Rates of hormone therapy alone (HT) or chemo-endocrine therapy (CT+HT) recommendations before testing (Pre RS) and changes in recommendations based on the test resutls (Post RS).
Fig. 2
Fig. 2. Patients with post-RS recommendations for chemo-endocriine therapy (CT + HT): actual number based on previous RS cut points and expected percentage assuming decision-making according to TAILORx results (N = 1683).
Pre RS: treatment recommendations before avalability of the Recurrence Score result. Post RS: treatment recommendations accounting for the Recurrence Score result.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Ferlay J, et al. Estimating the global cancer incidence and mortality in 2018: GLOBOCAN sources and methods. Int. J. Cancer. 2019;144:1941–1953. doi: 10.1002/ijc.31937. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Howlader N, et al. US incidence of breast cancer subtypes defined by joint hormone receptor and HER2 status. J. Natl Cancer Inst. 2014;106:5. doi: 10.1093/jnci/dju055. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Curigliano G, et al. De-escalating and escalating treatments for early-stage breast cancer: the St. Gallen International Expert Consensus Conference on the Primary Therapy of Early Breast Cancer 2017. Ann. Oncol. 2017;28:1700–1712. doi: 10.1093/annonc/mdx308. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Aapro M, et al. The MAGIC survey in hormone receptor positive (HR+), HER2-negative (HER2-) breast cancer: When might multigene assays be of value? Breast. 2017;33:191–199. doi: 10.1016/j.breast.2017.01.012. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Early Breast Cancer Trialists’ Collaborative Group (EBCTCG et al. Comparisons between different polychemotherapy regimens for early breast cancer: meta-analyses of long-term outcome among 100,000 women in 123 randomised trials. Lancet. 2012;379:432–444. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(11)61625-5. - DOI - PMC - PubMed