Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Randomized Controlled Trial
. 2021 Apr 13:2021:6664479.
doi: 10.1155/2021/6664479. eCollection 2021.

Cognitive Aftereffects of Acute tDCS Coupled with Cognitive Training: An fMRI Study in Healthy Seniors

Affiliations
Randomized Controlled Trial

Cognitive Aftereffects of Acute tDCS Coupled with Cognitive Training: An fMRI Study in Healthy Seniors

P Šimko et al. Neural Plast. .

Abstract

Enhancing cognitive functions through noninvasive brain stimulation is of enormous public interest, particularly for the aging population in whom processes such as working memory are known to decline. In a randomized double-blind crossover study, we investigated the acute behavioral and neural aftereffects of bifrontal and frontoparietal transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) combined with visual working memory (VWM) training on 25 highly educated older adults. Resting-state functional connectivity (rs-FC) analysis was performed prior to and after each stimulation session with a focus on the frontoparietal control network (FPCN). The bifrontal montage with anode over the left dorsolateral prefrontal cortex enhanced VWM accuracy as compared to the sham stimulation. With the rs-FC within the FPCN, we observed significant stimulation × time interaction using bifrontal tDCS. We found no cognitive aftereffects of the frontoparietal tDCS compared to sham stimulation. Our study shows that a single bifrontal tDCS combined with cognitive training may enhance VWM performance and rs-FC within the relevant brain network even in highly educated older adults.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors have no actual or potential conflicts of interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
During the opening session, participants underwent sMRI and a neuropsychological examination and they practiced the VOMT and online VWM task. The VOMT and rs-fMRI were performed prior to and after each tDCS.
Figure 2
Figure 2
VOMT using conventional and unconventional views of pairs of objects. Line 1: conventional view task condition, correct answer is YES (left button); line 2: conventional view task condition, correct response is NO (right button); line 3: unconventional view task condition, correct response is YES (left button); line 4: unconventional view task condition, correct response is NO (right button).
Figure 3
Figure 3
Experimental framework. The two subtasks differ only in the instructions given at the beginning of each run, instructing the participant which, if any, stimuli they should attempt to remember over a 9 s delay, and in the response requirements. In the response period of the two memory tasks, a face or scene stimulus was presented (corresponding to the relevant stimulus class), and participants were required to report with a button press whether the stimulus matched one of the previously presented stimuli.
Figure 4
Figure 4
(a, b) Anode and cathode placements for bifrontal and right frontoparietal tDCS montages, respectively, with example current density determined using SimNIBS modeling software [38]; (c) MNI (xyz) electrode-center coordinates for both tDCS montages.
Figure 5
Figure 5
List of selected seeds and their coordinates for the rs-fMRI network analysis. Images decomposed from ICA were used to adjust the seed positions taken from Gao and Lin [36]. Note: lSFG: left superior frontal gyrus; rSFG: right superior frontal gyrus; ACC: anterior cingulum; rIPL: right inferior parietal lobule; lIPL: left inferior parietal lobule; rIFG: right inferior frontal gyrus; lIFG: left inferior frontal gyrus.
Figure 6
Figure 6
Changes in overall accuracy (in percentage) after bifrontal tDCS montage.
Figure 7
Figure 7
Changes in rs-fMRI connectivity (in percentage) between lDLPFC and IPL using the bifrontal tDCS montage.

References

    1. Iachini T., Iavarone A., Senese V. P., Ruotolo F., Ruggiero G. Visuospatial memory in healthy elderly, AD and MCI: a review. Current Aging Science. 2009;2(1):43–59. doi: 10.2174/1874609810902010043. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Ko P. C., Duda B., Hussey E., et al. Understanding age-related reductions in visual working memory capacity: examining the stages of change detection. Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics. 2014;76(7):2015–2030. doi: 10.3758/s13414-013-0585-z. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Baddeley A. D., Hitch G. Working memory. Psychology of learning and motivation. 1974;8:47–89. doi: 10.1016/S0079-7421(08)60452-1. - DOI
    1. Baddeley A. Working memory. Science. 1992;255(5044):556–559. doi: 10.1126/science.1736359. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Baddeley A. Working memory: looking back and looking forward. Nature Reviews. Neuroscience. 2003;4(10):829–839. doi: 10.1038/nrn1201. - DOI - PubMed

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources