Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Randomized Controlled Trial
. 2022 Feb;37(2):327-331.
doi: 10.1007/s11606-021-06833-2. Epub 2021 May 5.

Predictors and Reasons Why Patients Decline to Participate in Home Hospital: a Mixed Methods Analysis of a Randomized Controlled Trial

David M Levine  1   2 , Mary Paz  3 , Kimberly Burke  4 , Jeffrey L Schnipper  5   6
Affiliations
Randomized Controlled Trial

Predictors and Reasons Why Patients Decline to Participate in Home Hospital: a Mixed Methods Analysis of a Randomized Controlled Trial

David M Levine et al. J Gen Intern Med. 2022 Feb.

Abstract

Background: Acute care at home ("home hospital") compared to traditional hospital care has been shown to lower cost, utilization, and readmission and improve patient experience and physical activity. Despite these benefits, many patients decline to enroll in home hospital.

Objective: Describe predictors and reasons why patients decline home hospital.

Design: Mixed methods evaluation of a randomized controlled trial.

Participants: Patients in the emergency department who required admission and were accepted for home hospital by the home hospital attending, but ultimately declined to enroll.

Intervention: Home hospital care, including nurse and physician home visits, intravenous medications, remote monitoring, video communication, and point-of-care testing.

Approach: We conducted a thematic content analysis of verbatim reasons for decline. We performed bivariate comparisons then multivariable logistic regression to identify patient characteristics associated with declining participation.

Key results: Two hundred forty-eight patients were eligible to enroll, and 157 (63%) declined enrollment. Patients who declined and enrolled were of similar age (median age, 74 vs 75 years old; p = 0.27), sex (32% vs 36% female; p = 0.49), and race/ethnicity (p = 0.26). In multivariable analysis, patients were significantly more likely to decline if they initially presented at the community hospital compared to the academic medical center (53% vs 42%; adjusted OR, 2.2 [95% CI, 1.2 to 4.2]) and if single (37% v 24%; adjusted OR, 2.5 [95% CI, 1.2 to 5.1]). We formulated 10 qualitative categories describing reasons patients ultimately declined. Many patients declined because they felt it was easier to remain in the hospital (20%) or felt safer in the hospital than in their home (20%).

Conclusions: Patients who declined to enroll in a home hospital intervention had similar sociodemographic characteristics as enrollees except partner status and declined most often for perceptions surrounding safety at home and the ease of remaining in the hospital.

Trial registration: NCT03203759.

Keywords: home hospital; hospital at home; refusal.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

None of the study’s commercial vendors participated in design, analysis, interpretation, preparation, review, or approval. Dr. Levine is the recipient of funding from Biofourmis for an investigator-initiated study of machine learning warning scores for acutely ill patients, both traditionally and home hospitalized. Dr. Schnipper was the recipient of funding from Mallinckrodt Pharmaceuticals for an investigator-initiated study of opioid related adverse drug events in post-operative hospitalized patients. Otherwise, the authors declare that they do not have a conflict of interest.

References

    1. FastStats - Health Expenditures. Accessed December 3, 2018. https://www.cdc.gov/nchs/fastats/health-expenditures.htm
    1. Hung WW, Ross JS, Farber J, Siu AL. Evaluation of the Mobile Acute Care of the Elderly (MACE) service. JAMA Intern Med. 2013;173(11):990–996. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2013.478. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Leff B. Defining and disseminating the hospital-at-home model. CMAJ. 2009;180(2):156–157. doi: 10.1503/cmaj.081891. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Caplan GA, Sulaiman NS, Mangin DA, Aimonino Ricauda N, Wilson AD, Barclay L. A meta-analysis of “hospital in the home”. Med J Aust. 2012;197(9):512–519. doi: 10.5694/mja12.10480. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Board N, Brennan N, Caplan GA. A randomised controlled trial of the costs of hospital as compared with hospital in the home for acute medical patients. Aust N Z J Public Health. 2000;24(3):305–311. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-842X.2000.tb01573.x. - DOI - PubMed

Publication types

Associated data