Place of a new radiological index in predicting pulp exposure before intervention for deep carious lesions
- PMID: 33954908
- DOI: 10.1007/s11282-021-00530-w
Place of a new radiological index in predicting pulp exposure before intervention for deep carious lesions
Abstract
Background: During interventions for deep caries lesions without severe symptoms, preserving pulpal vitality is important to ensure treatment success, improve organ prognosis, and decrease cost-effectiveness. Current pre-operative radiographs allow visual estimation but not accurate measurement of lesion depth.
Purpose: Investigate the ability of ratio 'remaining/total dentin thickness' (RDT/TDT, as determined on pre-operative radiographs) to predict pulp exposure during excavation.
Methods: This retrospective study (January 2018-June 2020) analyzed data on 360 patients. Four independent raters examined standard pre-operative radiographs and their contrasted versions. Lines put at the dentino-enamel junction, the floor of the carious lesion, and the pulp chamber wall allowed deriving RDT/TDT. Inter-rater agreements and concordance were assessed. A logistic regression accounting for measurement errors provided odds ratios that estimated the ability of the RDT/TDT to predict pulp exposure.
Results: The median RDT/TDT ratio ranges were 16.8-26.5% on standard and 16.2-24.6% on contrasted radiographs. Inter-rater agreements on RDT/TDT were rather poor and inter-rater reliability was low and similar in standard and contrasted radiographs: the concordance correlation coefficients (95% CIs) were estimated at 0.46 (0.40; 0.51) and 0.46 (0.40; 0.52), respectively. The risk of pulp exposure increased by 2.5 times [odds ratio (95% CI) 2.57 (2.06; 3.20)] per 10-point decrease of the ratio on standard radiographs vs. 4.15 (3.15; 5.46) on contrasted radiographs.
Conclusion: RDT/TDT ratio is potentially helpful in predicting pulp exposure. However, the measurement errors on RDT and TDT being non-negligible and the interrater agreements poor, there is still place for advances through development of an automated process that will improve reliability and reproducibility of pulp exposure risk assessment.
Clinical trial: Trial registration number. ClinicalTrials.gov NCT04607395, October 29, 2020.
Keywords: Dental pulp exposure; Measurement accuracy; Observer variation; Radiographic image enhancement; Radiography dental.
© 2021. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Japanese Society for Oral and Maxillofacial Radiology and Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.
References
-
- Peres MA, Macpherson LMD, Weyant RJ, Daly B, Venturelli R, Mathur MR, et al. Oral diseases: a global public health challenge. Lancet. 2019;394:249–60. - DOI
-
- Kassebaum NJ, Bernabé E, Dahiya M, Bhandari B, Murray CJL, Marcenes W. Global burden of untreated caries: a systematic review and metaregression. J Dent Res. 2015;94(5):650–8. - DOI
-
- Doméjean S, Grosgogeat B. Evidence-Based Deep Carious Lesion Management: From Concept to Application in Everyday Clinical Practice. Monogr Oral Sci. 2018;27:137–45. - DOI
-
- Barros MMAF, De Rodrigues MIQ, Muniz FWMG, Rodrigues LKA. Selective, stepwise, or nonselective removal of carious tissue: which technique offers lower risk for the treatment of dental caries in permanent teeth? A systematic review and meta-analysis. Clin Oral Invest. 2020;24:521–32. - DOI
-
- Villat C, Attal J-P, Brulat N, Decup F, Doméjean S, Dursun E, et al. One-step partial or complete caries removal and bonding with antibacterial or traditional self-etch adhesives: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial. Trials. 2016;17:404. - DOI
Publication types
MeSH terms
Associated data
LinkOut - more resources
Other Literature Sources
Medical