Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2021 Dec;81(4):327-330.
doi: 10.1111/jphd.12456. Epub 2021 May 5.

Dental amalgam restorations in nationally representative sample of US population aged ≥15 years: NHANES 2011-2016

Cameron G Estrich  1 , Ruth D Lipman  1 , Marcelo W B Araujo  1
Affiliations

Dental amalgam restorations in nationally representative sample of US population aged ≥15 years: NHANES 2011-2016

Cameron G Estrich et al. J Public Health Dent. 2021 Dec.

Abstract

Objectives: Estimate the proportion of amalgam restorations among the US population.

Methods: Data from ≥15 year old clinically examined dentate participants in three 2-year survey cycles (NHANES 2011-2016) were analyzed. The 2015-2016 data include restorative material type, allowing for the first time a US estimate of amalgam-restored teeth.

Results: The percent of the US population with at least one restoration (65.8 ± 1.4) was relatively constant in 2011-2016. Among those with restored teeth, the mean number of teeth with amalgam restorations increased with age from 4.71 among 15-24 year olds to 7.03 among those ≥75 years. Non-Hispanic Whites with restored teeth had the highest mean of teeth with amalgam restorations (5.94), while non-Hispanic Blacks had the lowest (5.08).

Conclusion: In 2015-2016, about half (51.5 percent) of restored teeth in the US population contained amalgam. Amalgam presence varied by age, tooth type, and race/ethnicity, but not by sex. These estimates can be used to assess future US caries prevention and dental amalgam reduction efforts.

Keywords: dental materials; dental restoration; mercury; permanent; population health; prevalence.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. National Institute for Dental and Craniofacial Research . Dental caries (tooth decay) 2018; [cited 2020 Jan 8]. Available from: https://www.nidcr.nih.gov/research/data-statistics/dental-caries
    1. Heaven TJ, Gordan VV, Litaker MS, Fellows JL, Brad Rindal D, Firestone AR, Gilbert GH, National Dental PBRN Collaborative Group . Agreement among dentists' restorative treatment planning thresholds for primary occlusal caries, primary proximal caries, and existing restorations: findings from the National Dental Practice‐Based Research Network. J Dent. 2013;41(8):718–25. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Signori C, Laske M, Bronkhorst EM, Huysmans M, Cenci MS, Opdam NJM. Impact of individual‐risk factors on caries treatment performed by general dental practitioners. J Dent. 2019;81:85–90. - PubMed
    1. Canadian Agency for Drugs and Technologies in Health . Composite resin versus amalgam for dental restorations: a health technology assessment. Ottawa, CA: Canadian Agency for Drugs and Technologies in Health; 2018. - PubMed
    1. Araujo MW, Lipman RD, Platt JA. Amalgam: impact on oral health and the environment must be supported by science. J Am Dent Assoc. 2019;150(10):813–5. - PubMed