Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2021 Jun;30(12):2710-2723.
doi: 10.1111/mec.15936. Epub 2021 May 19.

Unboxing mutations: Connecting mutation types with evolutionary consequences

Affiliations
Review

Unboxing mutations: Connecting mutation types with evolutionary consequences

Emma L Berdan et al. Mol Ecol. 2021 Jun.

Abstract

A key step in understanding the genetic basis of different evolutionary outcomes (e.g., adaptation) is to determine the roles played by different mutation types (e.g., SNPs, translocations and inversions). To do this we must simultaneously consider different mutation types in an evolutionary framework. Here, we propose a research framework that directly utilizes the most important characteristics of mutations, their population genetic effects, to determine their relative evolutionary significance in a given scenario. We review known population genetic effects of different mutation types and show how these may be connected to different evolutionary outcomes. We provide examples of how to implement this framework and pinpoint areas where more data, theory and synthesis are needed. Linking experimental and theoretical approaches to examine different mutation types simultaneously is a critical step towards understanding their evolutionary significance.

Keywords: adaptation; distribution of fitness effects; mutation; mutation rate; population genetics; recombination; speciation; structural variant.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

REFERENCES

    1. Allen Orr, H. (2005). The genetic theory of adaptation: A brief history. Nature Reviews Genetics, 6(2), 119-127.
    1. Archambeault, S. L., Bärtschi, L. R., Merminod, A. D., & Peichel, C. L. (2020). Adaptation via pleiotropy and linkage: Association mapping reveals a complex genetic architecture within the stickleback locus. Evolution Letters, 4(4), 282-301.
    1. Barton, H. J., & Zeng, K. (2018). New methods for inferring the distribution of fitness effects for indels and SNPs. Molecular Biology and Evolution, 35(6), 1536-1546.
    1. Barton, N. H. (1995). A general model for the evolution of recombination. Genetical Research, 65, 123-144. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0016672300033140
    1. Bataillon, T., & Bailey, S. F. (2014). Effects of new mutations on fitness: Insights from models and data. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 1320, 76-92. https://doi.org/10.1111/nyas.12460

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources