Testing a Novel Web-Based Neurocognitive Battery in the General Community: Validation and Usability Study
- PMID: 33955839
- PMCID: PMC8138705
- DOI: 10.2196/25082
Testing a Novel Web-Based Neurocognitive Battery in the General Community: Validation and Usability Study
Abstract
Background: In recent years, there has been increased interest in the development of remote psychological assessments. These platforms increase accessibility and allow clinicians to monitor important health metrics, thereby informing patient-centered treatment.
Objective: In this study, we report the properties and usability of a new web-based neurocognitive assessment battery and present a normative data set for future use.
Methods: A total of 781 participants completed a portion of 8 tasks that captured performance in auditory processing, visual-spatial working memory, visual-spatial learning, cognitive flexibility, and emotional processing. A subset of individuals (n=195) completed a 5-question survey measuring the acceptability of the tasks.
Results: Between 252 and 426 participants completed each task. Younger individuals outperformed their older counterparts in 6 of the 8 tasks. Therefore, central tendency data metrics were presented using 7 different age bins. The broad majority of participants found the tasks interesting and enjoyable and endorsed some interest in playing them at home. Only 1 of 195 individuals endorsed not at all for the statement, "I understood the instructions." Older individuals were less likely to understand the instructions; however, 72% (49/68) of individuals over the age of 60 years still felt that they mostly or very much understood the instructions.
Conclusions: Overall, the tasks were found to be widely acceptable to the participants. The use of web-based neurocognitive tasks such as these may increase the ability to deploy precise data-informed interventions to a wider population.
Keywords: BrainHQ; Posit Science Corporation; cognition; digital; normative; online; remote; web-based.
©Riley Capizzi, Melissa Fisher, Bruno Biagianti, Neelufaer Ghiasi, Ariel Currie, Karrie Fitzpatrick, Nicholas Albertini, Sophia Vinogradov. Originally published in the Journal of Medical Internet Research (https://www.jmir.org), 06.05.2021.
Conflict of interest statement
Conflicts of Interest: BB is a senior scientist at Posit Science, a company that produces cognitive training and assessment software. The assessments described in this study were provided for research purposes free of charge by Posit Science. SV has been a site PI on an NIH SBIR grant to Positscience Inc.
References
-
- Raven John C, Court JH, Raven JC. Oxford Psychologists Press. Oxford, England: Oxford Psychologists Press; 1998. [2021-03-26]. Raven's progressive matrices and vocabulary scales. https://www.worldcat.org/title/ravens-progressive-matrices-and-vocabular....
-
- Nuechterlein KH, Green MF, Kern RS, Baade LE, Barch DM, Cohen JD, Essock S, Fenton WS, Frese FJ, Gold JM, Goldberg T, Heaton RK, Keefe RS, Kraemer H, Mesholam-Gately R, Seidman LJ, Stover E, Weinberger DR, Young AS, Zalcman S, Marder SR. The MATRICS Consensus Cognitive Battery, part 1: test selection, reliability, and validity. Am J Psychiatry. 2008 Feb;165(2):203–13. doi: 10.1176/appi.ajp.2007.07010042. - DOI - PubMed
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
