Blind spots on CT imaging of the head: Insights from 5 years of report addenda at a single institution
- PMID: 33957385
- DOI: 10.1016/j.clinimag.2021.04.026
Blind spots on CT imaging of the head: Insights from 5 years of report addenda at a single institution
Abstract
Background: Errors of detection ("misses") are the major source of error in radiology. There is sparse prior literature describing patterns of detection error on CT head imaging.
Purpose: The objective of this study was to gain insight to areas on CT head imaging where radiologists are most likely to miss clinically relevant findings.
Methods: We performed a cross-sectional study of consecutive reports of CT imaging of the head at a single institution spanning 5/1/2013-5/1/2018 (5 years). Detection errors described in addenda were categorized according to anatomic location, type of pathology, and potential impact on management. Blind spots were defined by the most common sites of missed findings.
Results: A total of 165,943 reports for CT head imaging were obtained. Addenda were found in 1658 (~1%) of reports, of which 359 (21.7%) described errors of detection. Within the extracranial soft tissues (n = 73) the most common "misses" were at incidentally imaged parotid glands and the frontal scalp. Within osseous structures (n = 149), blind spots included the nasal and occipital bones. Vascular lesions (n = 47) which passed detection were most common at the distal MCA, carotid terminus and sigmoid sinus/jugular bulb. No predisposition was seen for anatomic subsites within the CSF space (n = 60) and brain parenchyma (n = 65).
Conclusions: Consistent patterns of blind spots are revealed. Radiologic teaching and search patterns to account for these sites of error may accelerate trainee competence and improve accuracy in the practice of radiology.
Keywords: Blind spots; Brain; CT; Error; Head; Misses.
Copyright © 2021. Published by Elsevier Inc.
Similar articles
-
Blind spots in brain imaging: a pictorial essay.Quant Imaging Med Surg. 2025 Jan 2;15(1):1023-1039. doi: 10.21037/qims-24-1270. Epub 2024 Dec 30. Quant Imaging Med Surg. 2025. PMID: 39839019 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Diagnostic errors in abdominopelvic CT interpretation: characterization based on report addenda.Abdom Radiol (NY). 2016 Sep;41(9):1793-9. doi: 10.1007/s00261-016-0741-8. Abdom Radiol (NY). 2016. PMID: 27108129
-
Radiology Reporting Errors: Learning from Report Addenda.Indian J Radiol Imaging. 2021 Apr;31(2):333-344. doi: 10.1055/s-0041-1734351. Epub 2021 Aug 12. Indian J Radiol Imaging. 2021. PMID: 34556916 Free PMC article.
-
Analysis of misses in imaging of head and neck pathology by attending neuroradiologists at a single tertiary academic medical centre.Clin Radiol. 2021 Oct;76(10):786.e9-786.e13. doi: 10.1016/j.crad.2021.06.011. Epub 2021 Jul 23. Clin Radiol. 2021. PMID: 34304864
-
The blind spots on chest computed tomography: what do we miss.J Thorac Dis. 2024 Dec 31;16(12):8782-8795. doi: 10.21037/jtd-24-1125. Epub 2024 Dec 27. J Thorac Dis. 2024. PMID: 39831206 Free PMC article. Review.
Cited by
-
An imaging potpourri of uncommon traumatic scalp injuries.Emerg Radiol. 2025 Aug;32(4):645-652. doi: 10.1007/s10140-025-02362-1. Epub 2025 Jun 26. Emerg Radiol. 2025. PMID: 40569341 Review.
-
Blind spots in brain imaging: a pictorial essay.Quant Imaging Med Surg. 2025 Jan 2;15(1):1023-1039. doi: 10.21037/qims-24-1270. Epub 2024 Dec 30. Quant Imaging Med Surg. 2025. PMID: 39839019 Free PMC article. Review.
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources