Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2021 May 6;19(1):76.
doi: 10.1186/s12961-021-00707-z.

Learning from public health and hospital resilience to the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic: protocol for a multiple case study (Brazil, Canada, China, France, Japan, and Mali)

Affiliations

Learning from public health and hospital resilience to the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic: protocol for a multiple case study (Brazil, Canada, China, France, Japan, and Mali)

Valéry Ridde et al. Health Res Policy Syst. .

Abstract

Background: All prevention efforts currently being implemented for COVID-19 are aimed at reducing the burden on strained health systems and human resources. There has been little research conducted to understand how SARS-CoV-2 has affected health care systems and professionals in terms of their work. Finding effective ways to share the knowledge and insight between countries, including lessons learned, is paramount to the international containment and management of the COVID-19 pandemic. The aim of this project is to compare the pandemic response to COVID-19 in Brazil, Canada, China, France, Japan, and Mali. This comparison will be used to identify strengths and weaknesses in the response, including challenges for health professionals and health systems.

Methods: We will use a multiple case study approach with multiple levels of nested analysis. We have chosen these countries as they represent different continents and different stages of the pandemic. We will focus on several major hospitals and two public health interventions (contact tracing and testing). It will employ a multidisciplinary research approach that will use qualitative data through observations, document analysis, and interviews, as well as quantitative data based on disease surveillance data and other publicly available data. Given that the methodological approaches of the project will be largely qualitative, the ethical risks are minimal. For the quantitative component, the data being used will be made publicly available.

Discussion: We will deliver lessons learned based on a rigorous process and on strong evidence to enable operational-level insight for national and international stakeholders.

Keywords: COVID-19; Design; Equity; Hospital; Lessons learned; Public health; Resilience.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no competing interests.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Map of case studies
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Health system resilience conceptual framework
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
Ideal hospital configuration
Fig. 4
Fig. 4
Comparative analysis example

References

    1. Anderson RM, Heesterbeek H, Klinkenberg D, Hollingsworth TD. How will country-based mitigation measures influence the course of the COVID-19 epidemic? Lancet. 2020;395:931–4. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(20)30567-5. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Thomas S, Sagan A, Larkin J, Cylus J, Figueras J, Karanikolos M. Strengthening health systems resilience. Key concepts and strategies. Copenhagen: WHO Regional Office for Europe; 2020 p. 29. Report No.: Policy Brief 36. - PubMed
    1. Legido-Quigley H, Mateos-García JT, Campos VR, Gea-Sánchez M, Muntaner C, McKee M. The resilience of the Spanish health system against the COVID-19 pandemic. Lancet Public Health. 2020;1:S2468266720300608. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Han E, Chiou S-T, McKee M, Legido-Quigley H. The resilience of Taiwan’s health system to address the COVID-19 pandemic. EClinicalMedicine. 2020;24. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Remuzzi A, Remuzzi G. COVID-19 and Italy: what next? Lancet. 2020;1:S0140673620306279. - PMC - PubMed