Framework for the public health assessment of electronic cigarettes
- PMID: 33958423
- DOI: 10.1136/tobaccocontrol-2020-056271
Framework for the public health assessment of electronic cigarettes
Abstract
Background: Electronic cigarettes (e-cigarettes) are relatively new products with substantial public health impacts. Evidence on their effects is diverse and emerging rapidly, presenting challenges to high-quality policymaking and decision-making. This paper addresses these challenges by developing and presenting a framework for the public health assessment of e-cigarettes, using the Australian context as an example.
Methods: Framework development involved stakeholder engagement, development of guiding principles, and consideration of existing relevant frameworks and the evidence requirements of current policy options, identified in published and grey literature.
Results: Guiding principles include the need for the framework to: be evidence based; include consideration of the likely balance of benefits and risks of e-cigarettes, uncertainty and safety; support equity; support the ongoing application of evidence to high-quality policy and practice; and consider potential competing interests. The framework draws upon: health technology assessment; health impact assessment; environmental health risk assessment; healthcare recommendations evidence evaluation; consumer goods regulation; medicine and chemical scheduling; tobacco product evaluation; previous reviews and the precautionary principle. Final framework components are: (1) characterisation of products under consideration; (2) definition of populations of interest; (3) characterisation of tobacco smoking, control and impacts on health and well-being; (4) review of evidence on patterns of e-cigarette use; (5) review of evidence on e-cigarette use and health outcomes; (6) assessment of likely risks, benefits and safety; (7) identification and assessment of policy options to optimise health outcomes.
Conclusions: Structured and ongoing public health assessment of e-cigarette use is likely to support health through enhancing evidence-based decision-making.
Keywords: electronic nicotine delivery devices; prevention; public policy.
© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2022. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.
Conflict of interest statement
Competing interests: None declared.
Similar articles
-
Public Health Policies on E-Cigarettes.Curr Cardiol Rep. 2019 Aug 28;21(10):111. doi: 10.1007/s11886-019-1204-y. Curr Cardiol Rep. 2019. PMID: 31463564 Free PMC article. Review.
-
A content analysis of the tweets of e-cigarette proponents in Australia.Health Promot J Austr. 2022 Apr;33(2):445-450. doi: 10.1002/hpja.510. Epub 2021 Jun 28. Health Promot J Austr. 2022. PMID: 34143553
-
Electronic cigarettes: an update on products, regulation, public health approaches and oral health.Community Dent Health. 2022 May 27;39(2):68-73. doi: 10.1922/CDH_00215Weke06. Community Dent Health. 2022. PMID: 34982860 Review.
-
No sisyphean task: how the FDA can regulate electronic cigarettes.Yale J Health Policy Law Ethics. 2013 Summer;13(2):326-74. Yale J Health Policy Law Ethics. 2013. PMID: 24340824
-
100 Million Views of Electronic Cigarette YouTube Videos and Counting: Quantification, Content Evaluation, and Engagement Levels of Videos.J Med Internet Res. 2016 Mar 18;18(3):e67. doi: 10.2196/jmir.4265. J Med Internet Res. 2016. PMID: 26993213 Free PMC article.
Cited by
-
Electronic cigarettes and health outcomes: epidemiological and public health challenges.Int J Epidemiol. 2023 Aug 2;52(4):984-992. doi: 10.1093/ije/dyad059. Int J Epidemiol. 2023. PMID: 37192053 Free PMC article. No abstract available.
-
Preliminary toxicological assessment of heated tobacco products: A review of the literature and proposed strategy.Toxicol Rep. 2023 Jan 20;10:195-205. doi: 10.1016/j.toxrep.2023.01.008. eCollection 2023. Toxicol Rep. 2023. PMID: 36748021 Free PMC article. Review.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical