Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2021 May;7(2):e001601.
doi: 10.1136/rmdopen-2021-001601.

Tofacitinib versus tocilizumab in the treatment of biological-naïve or previous biological-failure patients with methotrexate-refractory active rheumatoid arthritis

Affiliations

Tofacitinib versus tocilizumab in the treatment of biological-naïve or previous biological-failure patients with methotrexate-refractory active rheumatoid arthritis

Shunsuke Mori et al. RMD Open. 2021 May.

Abstract

Objectives: To compare effectiveness between tofacitinib and tocilizumab treatments for biological disease-modifying antirheumatic drug (bDMARD)-naïve patients or previous bDMARD-failure patients with active rheumatoid arthritis (RA) refractory to methotrexate (MTX).

Methods: We used two ongoing real-world registries of patients with RA who had first started tofacitinib or tocilizumab between August 2013 and February 2019 at our institutions. Clinical disease activity index (CDAI)-based improvements at 12 months were used for comparisons between tofacitinib and tocilizumab treatments, separately for bDMARD-naïve and previous bDMARD-failure patients.

Results: A total of 464 patients with RA with high or moderate CDAI were enrolled (247 with tofacitinib and 217 with tocilizumab). After adjustments for treatment-selection bias by propensity score matching, we showed that tofacitinib was more likely to induce and maintain ≥85% improvement in CDAI (CDAI85), CDAI70 and remission at 12 months compared with tocilizumab in bDMARD-naïve patients. After adjusting for concurrent use of MTX and prednisolone, the ORs of tofacitinib versus tocilizumab were 3.88 (95% CI 1.87 to 8.03) for CDAI85, 2.89 (95% CI 1.43 to 5.84) for CDAI70 and 3.31 (95% CI 1.69 to 6.48) for remission. These effects were not observed in bDMARD-failure patients. In tofacitinib treatment for bDMARD-failure patients, the number of previously failed bDMARD classes was not associated with CDAI-based improvements. The rate of overall adverse events was similar between both treatments. Similar ORs were obtained from patients adjusted by inverse probability of treatment weighting.

Conclusions: Compared with tocilizumab, tofacitinib can induce greater improvements during the first 12-month treatment in bDMARD-naïve patients, but this difference was not observed in previous bDMARD-failure patients.

Keywords: antirheumatic agents; arthritis; biological therapy; rheumatoid; therapeutics.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Competing interests: SM has received lecture fees from Pfizer Japan, Chugai Pharmaceutical Co, Astellas Pharma, Bristol-Myers Squibb K.K., Eisai Co, AbbVie GK, AYUMI Pharmaceutical Co, Asahi Kasei Pharma Co, Janssen Pharmaceutical K.K. and Mitsubishi Tanabe Pharma Co. YUrata has received lecture fees from Eli Lilly Japan K.K., Pfizer Japan and Chugai Pharmaceutical Co. YY has received lecture fees from Chugai Pharmaceutical Co, Bristol-Myers Squibb K.K., Mitsubishi Tanabe Pharma Co, Pfizer Japan, Janssen Pharmaceutical K.K., Takeda Pharmaceutical Co, Eli Lilly Japan K.K., AbbVie GK, AYUMI Pharmaceutical Co, Nippon Kayaku Co, Eisai Co, Teijin Pharma, UCB Japan Co, Boehringer Ingelheim, Nippon Zoki Pharmaceutical Co and Asahi Kasei Pharma Co. YUeki has received lecture fees from Chugai Pharmaceutical Co, Bristol-Myers Squibb K.K., Mitsubishi Tanabe Pharma Co, Pfizer Japan, Janssen Pharmaceutical K.K., Takeda Pharmaceutical Co, Eli Lilly Japan K.K., Astellas Pharma, Ono Pharmaceutical Co and Asahi Kasei Pharma Co.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Flowchart of study. MTX-refractory patients were defined as patients who had shown insufficient improvement (less than 50% of CDAI) to MTX therapy for ≥3 months. Previous bDMARD-failure patients were defined as patients who had experienced an inadequate response (lack or loss of efficacy) to at least one bDMARD. ACTRA-RI, ACTemura for RA patients with or without Renal Insufficiency; bDMARD, biological disease-modifying antirheumatic drug; CDAI, clinical disease activity index; MTX, methotrexate; RA, rheumatoid arthritis; TOFARA, TOFacitinib treatment for Active RA.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Fleischmann R. Tofacitinib in the treatment of active rheumatoid arthritis in adults. Immunotherapy 2018;10:39–56. 10.2217/imt-2017-0118 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Yamaoka K. Tofacitinib for the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis: an update. Expert Rev Clin Immunol 2019;15:577–88. 10.1080/1744666X.2019.1607298 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Nash P, Kerschbaumer A, Dörner T, et al. . Points to consider for the treatment of immune-mediated inflammatory diseases with Janus kinase inhibitors: a consensus statement. Ann Rheum Dis 2021;80:71–87. 10.1136/annrheumdis-2020-218398 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Fleischmann R, Kremer J, Cush J, et al. . Placebo-controlled trial of tofacitinib monotherapy in rheumatoid arthritis. N Engl J Med 2012;367:495–507. 10.1056/NEJMoa1109071 - DOI - PubMed
    1. van Vollenhoven RF, Fleischmann R, Cohen S, et al. . Tofacitinib or adalimumab versus placebo in rheumatoid arthritis. N Engl J Med 2012;367:508–19. 10.1056/NEJMoa1112072 - DOI - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms

LinkOut - more resources