Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2021 May 1;38(3):162-165.
doi: 10.1097/WNP.0000000000000749.

Changing Paradigms and Unmet Needs in Multiple Sclerosis: The Role of Clinical Neurophysiology

Affiliations
Review

Changing Paradigms and Unmet Needs in Multiple Sclerosis: The Role of Clinical Neurophysiology

Mark B Skeen. J Clin Neurophysiol. .

Abstract

Our increasing understanding of the immunopathogenesis of multiple sclerosis has led to the development of many disease-modifying therapies that have revolutionized the care of patients with relapsing forms of the disease. Our understanding of the pathophysiologic basis of progressive forms of the disease is much more limited but has dramatically changed over the past several decades. We are now on the verge of developing therapies that promote remyelination, reduce axonal loss, and restore axonal function. This progress is challenged by inadequate animal models of progressive disease and incomplete biomarkers of progression. In measuring central nervous system function, evoked potentials may have an advantage over biomarkers, which measure only pathologic change. Monitoring multifocal visual evoked potential amplitude may be one possible means of monitoring disease progression in multiple sclerosis. Additional clinical studies are required to document whether evoked potentials can adequately serve as effective biomarkers of progression.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Richert N, Zierak M, Bash C, et al. MRI and clinical activity in MS patients after terminating treatment with interferon beta-1b. Mult Scler 2000;6:86–90.
    1. Petkau J, Reingold S, Cutter G, et al. Magnetic resonance imaging as a surrogate outcome for multiple sclerosis relapses. Mult Scler 2008;14:770–778.
    1. Goodin D. Magnetic resonance imaging as a surrogate outcome measure of disability in multiple sclerosis: have we been overly harsh in our assessment? Ann Neurol 2006;59:597–605.
    1. Lassman H. Pathogenic mechanisms associated with different clinical courses of multiple sclerosis. Front Immunol 2019;9:1–14.
    1. Lucchinetti C, Bruck W. The pathology of primary progressive multiple sclerosis. Mult Scler 2004;10:S23–S30.