Workplace Bullying Among Junior Doctors in Malaysia: A Multicentre Cross-Sectional Study
- PMID: 33958968
- PMCID: PMC8075595
- DOI: 10.21315/mjms2021.28.2.13
Workplace Bullying Among Junior Doctors in Malaysia: A Multicentre Cross-Sectional Study
Abstract
Background: Research suggests that junior doctors often experience workplace bullying, which may have adverse impacts on medical training and delivery of quality healthcare. However, evidence among local population has not been established. The present study aims to examine the prevalence of workplace bullying among Malaysian junior doctors and explore its associated sociodemographic and employment factors.
Methods: A multicentre cross-sectional study was conducted in 12 government hospitals accredited for housemanship training within the central zone of Malaysia. The study included a total of 1,074 house officers who had been working for at least 6 months in various housemanship rotations. The Negative Acts Questionnaire-Revised (NAQ-R) was used to examine workplace bullying.
Results: The 6-month prevalence of workplace bullying among study participants was 13%. Work-related bullying such as 'being ordered to do work below your level of competence', person-related bullying such as 'being humiliated or ridiculed in connection with your work', and physically intimidating bullying such as 'being shouted at or being the target of spontaneous anger' were commonly reported by study participants. Medical officers were reported to be the commonest perpetrators of negative actions at the workplace. Study participants who graduated from Eastern European medical schools (adjusted odds ratio [AOR] 2.27; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.27, 4.07) and worked in surgical-based rotation (AOR 1.83; 95% CI: 1.13, 2.97) had higher odds of bullying compared to those who graduated from local medical schools and worked in medical-based rotation, whereas study participants with good English proficiency (AOR 0.14; 95% CI: 0.02, 0.94) had lower odds of bullying compared to those with poor English proficiency.
Conclusion: The present study shows that workplace bullying is prevalent among Malaysian junior doctors. Considering the gravity of its consequences, impactful strategies should be developed and implemented promptly in order to tackle this serious occupational hazard.
Keywords: Occupational Safety and Health; associated factors; junior doctors; prevalence; psychosocial hazard; workplace bullying.
© Penerbit Universiti Sains Malaysia, 2021.
Conflict of interest statement
Conflict of Interest None.
References
-
- Einarsen S. Harassment and bullying at work: a review of the Scandinavian approach. Aggress Violent Behav. 2000;5(4):379–401. doi: 10.1016/S1359-1789(98)00043-3. - DOI
-
- Einarsen S, Hoel H, Notelaers G. Measuring exposure to bullying and harassment at work: validity, factor structure and psychometric properties of the Negative Acts Questionnaire-Revised. Work Stress. 2009;23(1):24–44. doi: 10.1080/02678370902815673. - DOI
-
- Einarsen S, Skogstad A. Bullying at work: epidemiological findings in public and private organizations. Eur J Work Organ Psychol. 1996;5(2):185–201. doi: 10.1080/13594329608414854. - DOI
-
- Zapf D, Escartin J, Einarsen S, Hoel H, Vartia M. Empirical findings on prevalence and risk groups of bullying in the workplace. In: Einarsen S, Hoel H, Zapf D, Cooper CL, editors. Bullying and harassment in the workplace. London: Taylor and Francis; 2011. - DOI
-
- Paice E, Aitken M, Houghton A, Firth-Cozens J. Bullying among doctors in training: cross-sectional questionnaire survey. BMJ. 2004;329(7467):658–659. doi: 10.1136/bmj.38133.502569.AE. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources