Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2021 Mar 2;12(2):266-275.
doi: 10.4103/idoj.IDOJ_674_20. eCollection 2021 Mar-Apr.

Practical Guidelines to Develop and Evaluate a Questionnaire

Affiliations

Practical Guidelines to Develop and Evaluate a Questionnaire

Kamal Kishore et al. Indian Dermatol Online J. .

Abstract

Life expectancy is gradually increasing due to continuously improving medical and nonmedical interventions. The increasing life expectancy is desirable but brings in issues such as impairment of quality of life, disease perception, cognitive health, and mental health. Thus, questionnaire building and data collection through the questionnaires have become an active area of research. However, questionnaire development can be challenging and suboptimal in the absence of careful planning and user-friendly literature guide. Keeping in mind the intricacies of constructing a questionnaire, researchers need to carefully plan, document, and follow systematic steps to build a reliable and valid questionnaire. Additionally, questionnaire development is technical, jargon-filled, and is not a part of most of the graduate and postgraduate training. Therefore, this article is an attempt to initiate an understanding of the complexities of the questionnaire fundamentals, technical challenges, and sequential flow of steps to build a reliable and valid questionnaire.

Keywords: Instrument; psychometrics; questionnaire development; reliability; scale construction; validity.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

There are no conflicts of interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Flowchart demonstrating the various steps involved in the development of a questionnaire
Figure 2
Figure 2
A hypothetical example showing the researcher's dilemma of selecting 6, 10, or 15 factors through scree plot

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Streiner DL, Norman GR, Cairney J. Health Measurement Scales: A Practical Guide to their Development and Use. USA: Oxford University Press; 2015.
    1. Chapple ILC. Questionnaire research: An easy option? Br Dent J. 2003;195:359. - PubMed
    1. Boateng GO, Neilands TB, Frongillo EA, Melgar-Quiñonez HR, Young SL. Best practices for developing and validating scales for health, social, and behavioral research: A primer. Front Public Health. 2018;6:149. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Rubio DM, Berg-Weger M, Tebb SS, Lee ES, Rauch S. Objectifying content validity: Conducting a content validity study in social work research. Soc Work Res. 2003;27:94–104.
    1. Lawshe CH. A quantitative approach to content validity. Pers Pschol. 1975;28:563–75.