Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2022 Mar;26(6):1853-1864.
doi: 10.1111/jcmm.16586. Epub 2021 May 7.

Construction of circRNA-miRNA-mRNA network in the pathogenesis of recurrent implantation failure using integrated bioinformatics study

Affiliations

Construction of circRNA-miRNA-mRNA network in the pathogenesis of recurrent implantation failure using integrated bioinformatics study

Mohsen Ahmadi et al. J Cell Mol Med. 2022 Mar.

Abstract

This research attempted to elucidate the molecular components are involved in the pathogenesis of recurrent implantation failure (RIF). We initially identified that 386 mRNAs, 144 miRNAs and 2548 circRNAs were differentially expressed (DE) in RIF and then investigated the genetic cause of the observed abnormal expression by constructing a circRNA-miRNA-mRNA network considering the competing endogenous RNA theory. We further analysed the upstream transcription factors and related kinases of DEmRNAs (DEMs) and demonstrated that SUZ12, AR, TP63, NANOG, and TCF3 were the top five TFs binding to these DEMs. Besides, protein-protein interaction analysis disclosed that ACTB, CXCL10, PTGS2, CXCL12, GNG4, AGT, CXCL11, SST, PENK, and FOXM1 were the top 10 hub genes in the acquired network. Finally, we performed the functional enrichment analysis and found that arrhythmogenic right ventricular cardiomyopathy (ARVC), hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM), pathways in cancer, TNF signalling pathway and steroid hormone biosynthesis were the potentially disrupted pathways in RIF patients. Optimistically, our findings may deepen our apprehensions about the underlying molecular and biological causes of RIF and provide vital clues for future laboratory and clinical experiments that will ultimately bring a better outcome for patients with RIF.

Keywords: GEO; KEGG; bioinformatic; circular RNA; endometrium; expression; immune; implantation failure; microRNA; protein-protein interaction.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no competing interests.

Figures

FIGURE 1
FIGURE 1
Volcano plot shows the DEMs in GSE111974(A), DEMIs in GSE71332(B) and DECs in GSE147442(C). DEMs: differentially expressed mRNAs; DEMIs: differentially expressed miRNAs [Colour figure can be viewed at wileyonlinelibrary.com]
FIGURE 2
FIGURE 2
The CeRNA network of circRNA‐miRNA‐mRNA interactions in recurrent implantation failure. V shape indicates circRNAs, triangle indicates miRNAs and round rectangle indicates mRNAs. CeRNA: competitive endogenous RNA [Colour figure can be viewed at wileyonlinelibrary.com]
FIGURE 3
FIGURE 3
The TFs, mediatory protein and PKs networks. Expression2Kinases investigations signified the most enriched TFs, mediatory protein and kinase from the 386 DEMs in GSE111974 according to the integrated score (p‐value and z‐score). TFs, transpiration factors; PKs, protein kinases; DEMs, differentially expressed mRNAs [Colour figure can be viewed at wileyonlinelibrary.com]
FIGURE 4
FIGURE 4
The PPIs networks. The PPIs of 386 DEMs in GSE111974 were established using the STRING database. DEMs, differentially expressed mRNAs; PPI, protein‐protein interaction [Colour figure can be viewed at wileyonlinelibrary.com]
FIGURE 5
FIGURE 5
The functional enrichment analysis of 386 DEMs in GSE111974. The top 10 enriched GO (A) BP, (B) CC, (C) MF terms and (D) KEGG pathways. DEMs, differentially expressed mRNAs; GO, gene ontology; KEGG, Kyoto encyclopedia of genes and genomes; BP, biological process; CC, cellular component; MF, molecular function [Colour figure can be viewed at wileyonlinelibrary.com]

References

    1. Polanski LT, Baumgarten MN, Quenby S, Brosens J, Campbell BK, Raine‐Fenning NJ. What exactly do we mean by 'recurrent implantation failure'? A systematic review and opinion. Reprod Biomed Online. 2014;28(4):409‐423. 10.1016/j.rbmo.2013.12.006 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Wang F, Liu Y. Identification of key genes, regulatory factors, and drug target genes of recurrent implantation failure (RIF). Gynecol Endocrinol. 2020;36(5):448‐455. 10.1080/09513590.2019.1680622 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Bashiri A, Halper KI, Orvieto R. Recurrent Implantation Failure‐update overview on etiology, diagnosis, treatment and future directions. Reprod Biol Endocrinol. 2018;16(1):121. 10.1186/s12958-018-0414-2 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Ruiz‐Alonso M, Galindo N, Pellicer A, Simón C. What a difference two days make:“personalized” embryo transfer (pET) paradigm: a case report and pilot study. Hum Reprod. 2014;29(6):1244‐1247. - PubMed
    1. Feng C, Shen J‐M, Lv P‐P, et al. Construction of implantation failure related lncRNA‐mRNA network and identification of lncRNA biomarkers for predicting endometrial receptivity. Int J Biol Sci. 2018;14(10):1361‐1377. 10.7150/ijbs.25081 - DOI - PMC - PubMed

Publication types