Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2021 Oct;25(10):1526-1553.
doi: 10.1007/s10995-021-03170-y. Epub 2021 May 7.

Pediatric Group Care: A Systematic Review

Emily Gaskin  1   2 , Kim Weber Yorga  3   4 , Rebecca Berman  3 , Mandy Allison  5   6 , Jeanelle Sheeder  5
Affiliations

Pediatric Group Care: A Systematic Review

Emily Gaskin et al. Matern Child Health J. 2021 Oct.

Abstract

Objective: To describe characteristics and outcomes of Group Well-Child Care programs and provide recommendations for future research.

Methods: Informed by Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines, an electronic references database, manual search of bibliographies and peer-reviewed journals, and general Internet search were conducted including research published up to July 2019. English language, peer-reviewed research, with provision of medical care were included. Studies without published outcomes, not specific to well-child care, or included only one visit were excluded. Nineteen articles met review criteria. Study quality was assessed using the Downs and Black tool for rigor.

Results: Programs typically included an individual medical examination, check-in, and group discussion. Demographics varied by race, ethnicity, age, income level, education and parity, though many were used specifically with underserved populations. Group size ranged from 3 to 10 and lasted an average of 1.5 h over a period of 6-24 months. Evidence suggests group well-child care is as effective as individual care with improvement noted for health-care utilization, weight outcomes, and more content covered. Design elements such as patient-led discussion, self-check-in, inclusion of other family members, and use of a variety of health care professionals and para-professionals may influence these outcomes.

Conclusions: Group well-child care is useful in providing efficient and patient-centered care and shows promise for use in underserved populations. Future research should utilize more rigorous study design and include evaluations of program components and group processes to address implementation challenges and determine effectiveness.

Keywords: Group care; Group well-child care; Medical home; Pediatrics.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. American Academy of Pediatrics. (2010). Recommendations for preventive pediatric health care. Retrieved from http://brightfutures.aap.org/pdfs/AAP%20Bright%20Futures%20Periodicity%2... .
    1. Barker, K. (2003). Birthing and bureaucratic women: Needs talk and the definitional legacy of the Sheppard-Towner Act. Feminist Studies, 29(2), 333–355.
    1. Bloomfield, J., & Rising, S. S. (2013). CenteringParenting: An innovative dyad model for group mother-infant care. Journal of Midwifery & Women’s Health, 58(6), 683–689. https://doi.org/10.1111/jmwh.12132 . - DOI
    1. Children's Health, The Nation's Wealth: Assessing and Improving Child Health (0309091187). (2004). Retrieved from Washington (DC). https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22536616 .
    1. DeLago, C., Dickens, B., Phipps, E., Paoletti, A., Kazmierczak, M., & Irigoyen, M. (2018). Qualitative evaluation of individual and group well-child care. Academic Pediatric, 18(5), 516–524. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.acap.2018.01.005 . - DOI

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources