Ultra-low coverage whole genome sequencing of ccfDNA in multiple myeloma: A tool for laboratory routine?
- PMID: 33962213
- DOI: 10.1016/j.ctarc.2021.100380
Ultra-low coverage whole genome sequencing of ccfDNA in multiple myeloma: A tool for laboratory routine?
Abstract
Multiple myeloma (MM), is a heterogeneous disease in which chromosomal abnormalities are important for prognostic risk stratification. Cytogenetic profiling with FISH on plasma cells from bone marrow samples (BM-PCs) is the current gold standard, but variable infiltration of plasma cells or failed aspiration can hamper this process. Ultra-low coverage sequencing (ULCS) of circulating cell-free DNA (ccfDNA) may offer a minimally invasive alternative for the work-up of these cases. We compared ULCS, aCGH and FISH on selected BM-PCs in a routine setting with ULCS of ccfDNA for the detection of somatic copy number aberrations (CNAs) in MM.
Methods: Purified CD138+ BM-PCs of 23 MM patients at initiation of their treatment were subjected to aCGH, FISH and ULCS. Paired samples of peripheral blood-ccfDNA obtained at diagnosis were analyzed by ULCS and compared to the results found in BM-PCs.
Results: Using ULCS of ccfDNA, cytogenetic markers were identified in 18 out of 23 patients; five cases could not be analyzed due to low (≤3%) tumor fraction (TF). High similarity between CNA profiles of BM-PCs and ccfDNA was found. Moreover, 78% of the ccfDNA profiles resulted in the same risk classification as the routine FISH and/or BM-PCs ULCS and aCGH. Chromothripsis was detected in five patients; these had the highest TF values (range 7.1% to 42%) in our series and their profiles showed other high-risk anomalies.
Conclusion: This proof-of-principle study indicates that ULCS of ccfDNA can reveal CNAs in MM and should be explored further as a cost-efficient alternative, especially in cases where BM-PC purification fails.
Keywords: Chromothripsis; Molecular cytogenetics; Multiple myeloma; Tumor fraction; Ultra‐low coverage sequencing.
Copyright © 2021. Published by Elsevier Ltd.
Similar articles
-
Ultra-low depth sequencing of plasma cell DNA for the detection of copy number aberrations in multiple myeloma.Genes Chromosomes Cancer. 2020 Aug;59(8):465-471. doi: 10.1002/gcc.22848. Epub 2020 May 5. Genes Chromosomes Cancer. 2020. PMID: 32259320
-
Low-depth sequencing for copy number abnormalities in multiple myeloma supersedes fluorescent in situ hybridization in scope and resolution.Clin Genet. 2019 Aug;96(2):163-168. doi: 10.1111/cge.13561. Epub 2019 May 29. Clin Genet. 2019. PMID: 31066036
-
The combination of WGS and RNA-Seq is superior to conventional diagnostic tests in multiple myeloma: Ready for prime time?Cancer Genet. 2020 Apr;242:15-24. doi: 10.1016/j.cancergen.2020.01.001. Epub 2020 Jan 11. Cancer Genet. 2020. PMID: 31980417
-
Recent advances in cytogenetic characterization of multiple myeloma.Int J Lab Hematol. 2019 Feb;41(1):5-14. doi: 10.1111/ijlh.12882. Epub 2018 Jul 3. Int J Lab Hematol. 2019. PMID: 29971938 Review.
-
Assessing genome-wide copy number aberrations and copy-neutral loss-of-heterozygosity as best practice: An evidence-based review from the Cancer Genomics Consortium working group for plasma cell disorders.Cancer Genet. 2018 Dec;228-229:184-196. doi: 10.1016/j.cancergen.2018.07.002. Epub 2018 Oct 5. Cancer Genet. 2018. PMID: 30393007 Review.
Cited by
-
Basic ctDNA Panel Promises Affordable Clinical Validity in Colon Cancer Patients but Not in Pancreas Cancer Patients.Life (Basel). 2023 Nov 28;13(12):2274. doi: 10.3390/life13122274. Life (Basel). 2023. PMID: 38137875 Free PMC article.
-
Liquid biopsy by analysis of circulating myeloma cells and cell-free nucleic acids: a novel noninvasive approach of disease evaluation in multiple myeloma.Biomark Res. 2023 Mar 8;11(1):27. doi: 10.1186/s40364-023-00469-6. Biomark Res. 2023. PMID: 36890597 Free PMC article. Review.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
Miscellaneous