Systematic review of experiences and perceptions of key actors and organisations at multiple levels within health systems internationally in responding to COVID-19
- PMID: 33962635
- PMCID: PMC8103061
- DOI: 10.1186/s13012-021-01114-2
Systematic review of experiences and perceptions of key actors and organisations at multiple levels within health systems internationally in responding to COVID-19
Abstract
Background: COVID-19 has presented challenges to healthcare systems and healthcare professionals internationally. After one year of the pandemic, the initial evidence on health system responses begins to consolidate, and there is a need to identify and synthesise experiences of responding to COVID-19 among healthcare professionals and other health system stakeholders. This systematic review of primary qualitative studies depicts the experiences and perceptions of organisations and actors at multiple levels of health systems internationally in responding to COVID-19.
Methods: Six main databases of biomedical information, public health and health administration research were searched over the period October 1, 2019, to October 21, 2020. Information extracted from included studies was analysed thematically.
Results: Thirty-four studies were eligible for data extraction. Nine of those studies, of lower methodological quality, were removed from the thematic analysis of study results. Considering the professional level experiences, predominant themes of the studies consisted of the new roles and responsibilities of healthcare workers, burnout and distress, recognition of ´unseen´ healthcare workers, and positive changes and emergent solutions amid the crisis. Organisational level findings of the studies included provision of psychological support, COVID-19 as "catalyst" for change, and exercise of more "open" leadership by managers and health authorities. Continuous training, regulation of working conditions, providing supportive resources, coordinating a diversity of actors, and reviewing and updating regulations were roles identified at the local health system level.
Conclusions: The experiences of frontline healthcare workers have been the focus of attention of the majority of primary qualitative studies as of October 2020. However, organisational and wider system level studies indicate that some responses to COVID-19 have been characterised by increased emphasis on coordination activities by local health system actors, making service adaptations at pace, and reliance on expanded roles of front-line workers. The need for theory-informed qualitative studies was identified at the organisational level.
Trial registration: CRD42020202875.
Keywords: COVID-19; Health administration; Healthcare workers; Qualitative; Systematic review.
Conflict of interest statement
The authors declare that they have no competing interests.
Similar articles
-
A longitudinal qualitative exploration of victorian healthcare workers' and organisations' evolving views and experiences during COVID-19.BMC Health Serv Res. 2024 May 7;24(1):596. doi: 10.1186/s12913-024-11067-z. BMC Health Serv Res. 2024. PMID: 38715025 Free PMC article.
-
Barriers and facilitators to healthcare workers' adherence with infection prevention and control (IPC) guidelines for respiratory infectious diseases: a rapid qualitative evidence synthesis.Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2020 Apr 21;4(4):CD013582. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013582. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2020. PMID: 32315451 Free PMC article.
-
Managers' experiences in leading healthcare workers in hospital departments during a pandemic: a qualitative study.BMC Health Serv Res. 2025 May 13;25(1):690. doi: 10.1186/s12913-025-12759-w. BMC Health Serv Res. 2025. PMID: 40361093 Free PMC article.
-
Organisational responses to mitigate the effects of COVID-19 on healthcare workers: a qualitative case study from Bogotá, Colombia.BMC Health Serv Res. 2021 Aug 11;21(1):792. doi: 10.1186/s12913-021-06825-2. BMC Health Serv Res. 2021. PMID: 34380486 Free PMC article.
-
Experiences of frontline healthcare workers and their views about support during COVID-19 and previous pandemics: a systematic review and qualitative meta-synthesis.BMC Health Serv Res. 2021 Sep 6;21(1):923. doi: 10.1186/s12913-021-06917-z. BMC Health Serv Res. 2021. PMID: 34488733 Free PMC article.
Cited by
-
Substance Use in Healthcare Professionals During the COVID-19 Pandemic in Latin America: A Systematic Review and a Call for Reports.Subst Abuse. 2022 Mar 29;16:11782218221085592. doi: 10.1177/11782218221085592. eCollection 2022. Subst Abuse. 2022. PMID: 35369382 Free PMC article. Review.
-
How can health systems sustain lessons drawn from emergency contexts? Evidence from Colombia.PLoS One. 2025 Jul 31;20(7):e0322486. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0322486. eCollection 2025. PLoS One. 2025. PMID: 40743134 Free PMC article.
-
A qualitative study of reinforcement workers' perceptions and experiences of working in intensive care during the COVID-19 pandemic: A PsyCOVID-ICU substudy.PLoS One. 2022 Mar 4;17(3):e0264287. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0264287. eCollection 2022. PLoS One. 2022. PMID: 35245297 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
-
Retraction Note: A thematic analysis of system wide learning from first wave Covid-19 in the east of England.BMC Health Serv Res. 2022 Jul 5;22(1):868. doi: 10.1186/s12913-022-08263-0. BMC Health Serv Res. 2022. PMID: 35790965 Free PMC article. No abstract available.
-
Communication to promote and support physical distancing for COVID-19 prevention and control.Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2023 Oct 9;10(10):CD015144. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD015144. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2023. PMID: 37811673 Free PMC article. Review.
References
Publication types
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical