Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2021 May 7;79(1):72.
doi: 10.1186/s13690-021-00586-4.

Detecting anxiety and depression among people with limited literacy living with chronic low back pain in Nigeria: adaptation and validation of the hospital anxiety and depression scale

Chinonso Nwamaka Igwesi-Chidobe  1   2 , Rosemary C Muomah  3 , Isaac Olubunmi Sorinola  4 , Emma Louise Godfrey  4   5
Affiliations

Detecting anxiety and depression among people with limited literacy living with chronic low back pain in Nigeria: adaptation and validation of the hospital anxiety and depression scale

Chinonso Nwamaka Igwesi-Chidobe et al. Arch Public Health. .

Abstract

Background: The Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) is one of the most popular measures of anxiety and depression. The original HADS is mostly used in Nigeria precluding people with limited literacy. This study aimed to cross-culturally adapt and psychometrically test the HADS for rural and urban Nigerian Igbo populations with chronic low back pain (CLBP) who have limited literacy.

Methods: The HADS was forward translated, back translated, and appraised. Face and content validity was ensured by pre-testing the translated measure among a convenience sample of twelve rural Nigerian dwellers with CLBP. Reliability utilising Cronbach's alpha, intraclass correlation coefficient, Bland-Altman plots and minimal detectable change were investigated amongst a convenience sample of 50 people living with CLBP in rural and urban Nigerian communities. Construct validity testing involving correlations between Igbo-HADS and Roland Morris Disability Questionnaire measuring self-reported back pain-specific disability, World Health Organisation Disability Assessment Schedule assessing generic self-reported disability, Fear Avoidance Beliefs Questionnaire measuring fear avoidance beliefs, and eleven-point box scale assessing pain intensity, and exploratory factor analysis (EFA) and confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) among a random sample of 200 adults with CLBP in rural Nigerian communities were conducted.

Results: Idioms and colloquialisms were difficult to adapt. Internal consistency was good (α = 0.78) and acceptable (α = 0.67) for anxiety and depression subscales respectively. Intraclass correlation coefficients were very good (ICC ≃ 0.8) for both subscales. Minimal detectable change was 6.23 and 5.06 for anxiety and depression subscales respectively. The Igbo-HADS and the anxiety subscale had strong correlations (≃ 0.7) with generic self-reported disability; moderate correlations (≃ 0.5-0.6) with pain intensity, self-reported back pain-specific disability, and fear avoidance beliefs. The depression subscale had the lowest correlations (≃ 0.3-0.4) with these outcomes. The EFA produced a two-factor structure with cross-loading of items. The CFA showed poor fit indices for the EFA structure, the original two-factor structure, and one-factor structure.

Conclusion: The HADS may not be suitable for assessing anxiety and depression, or emotional distress in this population due to difficulty achieving cross-cultural equivalence with western idioms; and the expression of emotional distress through somatisation in this culture.

Keywords: Anxiety; Chronic low back pain disability; Depression; Hospital anxiety and depression scale; Nigeria.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Cross-cultural adaptation stages
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Bland-Altman plot for test-retest agreement of lgbo-HADS (anxiety)
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
Bland-Altman plot for test-retest agreement of lgbo-HADS (depression)
Fig. 4
Fig. 4
a lgbo-HADSS EFA structure applied to CFA. b Two-factor structure of original HADS. c One-factor structure applied to lgbo-HADS in CFA
See this image and copyright information in PMC

Similar articles

See all similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Pincus T, Burton AK, Vogel S, Field AP. A systematic review of psychological factors as predictors of chronicity/disability in prospective cohorts of low back pain. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2002;27(5):E109–E120. doi: 10.1097/00007632-200203010-00017. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Pincus T, McCracken LM. Psychological factors and treatment opportunities in low back pain. Best Pract Res Clin Rheumatol. 2013;27(5):625–635. doi: 10.1016/j.berh.2013.09.010. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Nicholas MK, Linton SJ, Watson PJ, Main CJ. Group “decade of the flags” working. Early identification and management of psychological risk factors (“yellow flags”) in patients with low back pain: a reappraisal. Phys Ther. 2011;91(5):737–753. doi: 10.2522/ptj.20100224. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Ramond A, Bouton C, Richard I, Roquelaure Y, Baufreton C, Legrand E, Huez JF. Psychosocial risk factors for chronic low back pain in primary care—a systematic review. Fam Pract. 2011;28(1):12–21. doi: 10.1093/fampra/cmq072. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Bener A, Verjee M, Dafeeah EE, Falah O, Al-Juhaishi T, Schlogl J, et al. Psychological factors: anxiety, depression, and somatization symptoms in low back pain patients. J Pain Res. 2013;6:95. doi: 10.2147/JPR.S40740. - DOI - PMC - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources