Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2021 Sep;93(9):5481-5486.
doi: 10.1002/jmv.27069. Epub 2021 May 19.

RT-PCR/MALDI-TOF mass spectrometry-based detection of SARS-CoV-2 in saliva specimens

Affiliations

RT-PCR/MALDI-TOF mass spectrometry-based detection of SARS-CoV-2 in saliva specimens

Matthew M Hernandez et al. J Med Virol. 2021 Sep.

Abstract

As severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus-2 (SARS-CoV-2) infections continue, there is a substantial need for cost-effective and large-scale testing that utilizes specimens that can be readily collected from both symptomatic and asymptomatic individuals in various community settings. Although multiple diagnostic methods utilize nasopharyngeal specimens, saliva specimens represent an attractive alternative as they can rapidly and safely be collected from different populations. While saliva has been described as an acceptable clinical matrix for the detection of SARS-CoV-2, evaluations of analytic performance across platforms for this specimen type are limited. Here, we used a novel sensitive RT-PCR/MALDI-TOF mass spectrometry-based assay (Agena MassARRAY®) to detect SARS-CoV-2 in saliva specimens. The platform demonstrated high diagnostic sensitivity and specificity when compared to matched patient upper respiratory specimens. We also evaluated the analytical sensitivity of the platform and determined the limit of detection of the assay to be 1562.5 copies/ml. Furthermore, across the five individual target components of this assay, there was a range in analytic sensitivities for each target with the N2 target being the most sensitive. Overall, this system also demonstrated comparable performance when compared to the detection of SARS-CoV-2 RNA in saliva by the cobas® 6800/8800 SARS-CoV-2 real-time RT-PCR Test (Roche). Together, we demonstrate that saliva represents an appropriate matrix for SARS-CoV-2 detection on the novel Agena system as well as on a conventional real-time RT-PCR assay. We conclude that the MassARRAY® system is a sensitive and reliable platform for SARS-CoV-2 detection in saliva, offering scalable throughput in a large variety of clinical laboratory settings.

Keywords: MALDI-TOF; SARS-CoV-2; real-time RT-PCR; saliva.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare that there are no conflict of interests.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Quantitative comparison of SARS‐CoV‐2 targets detected in clinical saliva specimens. Scatter plots depict the number of SARS‐CoV‐2 targets on the Agena platform detected and the corresponding Roche Ct for each clinical saliva specimen. (A) Ct values for Roche target T1 (Orf1ab) and (B) Roche target T2 (E gene) are depicted for individual clinical saliva specimens. Medians are depicted in each column. Statistically significant differences are depicted (e.g., *p < 0.05; **p < 0.01; ***p < 0.001, ****p < 0.0001) based on the student t test or Mann–Whitney nonparametric test depending on whether data was normally distributed (see Sction 2). SARS‐CoV‐2, severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus‐2
Figure 2
Figure 2
Evaluation of Roche and Agena SARS‐CoV‐2 target sensitivity. (A) Bar graph depicts the percent of spiked saliva specimens detected overall by the Agena MassARRAY® platform at five different concentrations (log). Overlaid are the individual sensitivities of the five Agena targets at each concentration. (B) Scatter plot of Ct values of Roche T1 (pink) and T2 (blue) targets across concentrations (log) of spiked saliva specimens at six different concentrations. Mean, SD of the mean, and line of best fit with 95% confidence intervals are depicted for each target. Above each concentration is the percent of replicates detected by T1 or T2 targets. SARS‐CoV‐2, severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus‐2.

References

    1. Lieberman JA, Pepper G, Naccache SN, Huang M‐L, Jerome KR, Greninger AL. Comparison of commercially available and laboratory‐developed assays for in vitro detection of SARS‐CoV‐2 in clinical laboratories. J Clin Microbiol. 2020;58(8):e00821‐20. 10.1128/JCM.00821-20 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Kaul KL. Laboratories and pandemic preparedness: a framework for collaboration and oversight. J Mol Diagn. 2020;22(7):841‐843. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Zehnbauer B. Diagnostics in the time of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID‐19): challenges and opportunities. J Mol Diagn. 2021;23(1):1‐2. - PMC - PubMed
    1. In Vitro Diagnostics EUAs. U.S. Food and Drug Administration. Published Febraury 17, 2021. Accessed February 21, 2021. https://www.fda.gov/medical-devices/coronavirus-disease-2019-covid-19-em...
    1. Butler‐Laporte G, Lawandi A, Schiller I, et al. Comparison of saliva and nasopharyngeal swab nucleic acid amplification testing for detection of SARS‐CoV‐2: a systematic review and meta‐analysis. JAMA Intern Med. Published online. 2021;181:353‐360. 10.1001/jamainternmed.2020.8876 - DOI - PMC - PubMed

MeSH terms