Grading nutrition evidence: where to go from here?
- PMID: 33963733
- PMCID: PMC8168365
- DOI: 10.1093/ajcn/nqab124
Grading nutrition evidence: where to go from here?
Comment on
-
Characteristics and quality of systematic reviews and meta-analyses of observational nutritional epidemiology: a cross-sectional study.Am J Clin Nutr. 2021 Jun 1;113(6):1578-1592. doi: 10.1093/ajcn/nqab002. Am J Clin Nutr. 2021. PMID: 33740039 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Barnard ND, Willett WC, Ding EL. The misuse of meta-analysis in nutrition research. JAMA. 2017;318:1435–6. - PubMed
-
- Zeraatkar D, Bhasin A, Morassut RE, Churchill I, Gupta A, Lawson DO, Miroshnychenko A, Sirotich E, Aryal K, Mikhail Det al. Descriptive analysis of the characteristics and quality of systematic reviews and meta-analyses of observational nutritional epidemiology: a cross-sectional study. Am J Clin Nutr. 2021; doi: 10.1093/ajcn/nqab002. - PMC - PubMed
-
- Schünemann HJ, Cuello C, Akl EA, Mustafa RA, Meerpohl JJ, Thayer K, Morgan RL, Gartlehner G, Kunz R, Katikireddi SVet al. GRADE guidelines: 18. How ROBINS-I and other tools to assess risk of bias in nonrandomized studies should be used to rate the certainty of a body of evidence. J Clin Epidemiol. 2019;111:105–14. - PMC - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
