Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Editorial
. 2021 Jun 1;113(6):1385-1387.
doi: 10.1093/ajcn/nqab124.

Grading nutrition evidence: where to go from here?

Affiliations
Editorial

Grading nutrition evidence: where to go from here?

Deirdre K Tobias et al. Am J Clin Nutr. .
No abstract available

PubMed Disclaimer

Comment on

References

    1. Satija A, Yu E, Willett WC, Hu FB. Understanding nutritional epidemiology and its role in policy. Adv Nutr. 2015;6:5–18. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Barnard ND, Willett WC, Ding EL. The misuse of meta-analysis in nutrition research. JAMA. 2017;318:1435–6. - PubMed
    1. Zeraatkar D, Bhasin A, Morassut RE, Churchill I, Gupta A, Lawson DO, Miroshnychenko A, Sirotich E, Aryal K, Mikhail Det al. Descriptive analysis of the characteristics and quality of systematic reviews and meta-analyses of observational nutritional epidemiology: a cross-sectional study. Am J Clin Nutr. 2021; doi: 10.1093/ajcn/nqab002. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Atkins D, Best D, Briss PA, Eccles M, Falck-Ytter Y, Flottorp S, Guyatt GH, Harbour RT, Haugh MC, Henry Det al. Grading quality of evidence and strength of recommendations. BMJ. 2004;328:1490. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Schünemann HJ, Cuello C, Akl EA, Mustafa RA, Meerpohl JJ, Thayer K, Morgan RL, Gartlehner G, Kunz R, Katikireddi SVet al. GRADE guidelines: 18. How ROBINS-I and other tools to assess risk of bias in nonrandomized studies should be used to rate the certainty of a body of evidence. J Clin Epidemiol. 2019;111:105–14. - PMC - PubMed